<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Does proc glmselect support random effects in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Does-proc-glmselect-support-random-effects/m-p/452311#M23619</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Answer is no.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But you could use interact term to simulate RANDOM effect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;model y=x1 x2 x1*x2&amp;nbsp; x1*x1 x2*x2 ;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2018 12:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-04-08T12:51:30Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Does proc glmselect support random effects</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Does-proc-glmselect-support-random-effects/m-p/452216#M23616</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm building a predictive model that predicts future&amp;nbsp;hospital length of stay. The dataset&amp;nbsp;is episode level, including multiple episodes&amp;nbsp;for many of the&amp;nbsp;members. I'd like to use a penalized GLM (such as a lasso) while at the same time including a&amp;nbsp;member-level random effect.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know proc glmselect does not have a "random" statement. Is there a feature I'm missing or a workaround that allows random effects to be included in a predictive model?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2018 18:24:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Does-proc-glmselect-support-random-effects/m-p/452216#M23616</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-07T18:24:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does proc glmselect support random effects</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Does-proc-glmselect-support-random-effects/m-p/452311#M23619</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Answer is no.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But you could use interact term to simulate RANDOM effect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;model y=x1 x2 x1*x2&amp;nbsp; x1*x1 x2*x2 ;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2018 12:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Does-proc-glmselect-support-random-effects/m-p/452311#M23619</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-08T12:51:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Does proc glmselect support random effects</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Does-proc-glmselect-support-random-effects/m-p/452365#M23620</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you Ksharp - I could treat the Member ID # as a fixed effect and model it's interactions, but wouldn't that&amp;nbsp;mean having thousands of Member ID # dummy variables (and using up lots of degrees of freedom)?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 08 Apr 2018 21:13:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Does-proc-glmselect-support-random-effects/m-p/452365#M23620</guid>
      <dc:creator>RobertF</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-04-08T21:13:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

