<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Issues with Proc GLIMMIX Intercept/LSmeans in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Issues-with-Proc-GLIMMIX-Intercept-LSmeans/m-p/443161#M23296</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Moved to "SAS Procedures" forum.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 02:41:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ChrisNZ</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-03-07T02:41:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Issues with Proc GLIMMIX Intercept/LSmeans</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Issues-with-Proc-GLIMMIX-Intercept-LSmeans/m-p/443128#M23295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm running a GLMM&amp;nbsp; with a binomial error distribution on proportion parasitism data values which range 0-1 and are not transformed.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm having a problem where I'm getting a negative intercept and thus my LSMEANS are negative, which shouldn't be the case. Unless it should be the case due to the link function...?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The model code looks like this&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=final ic=q;&lt;BR /&gt;class interval climate season site;&lt;BR /&gt;model parasitism = interval(season) season climate tot_nymprev / dist=bin link=logit s;&lt;BR /&gt;random intercept / subject=site;&lt;BR /&gt;random interval / subject=site residual;&lt;BR /&gt;random _residual_;&lt;BR /&gt;lsmeans season /cl diff plot=meanplot adjust=tukey;&lt;BR /&gt;lsmeans climate /cl diff plot=meanplot adjust=tukey;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Proc means gives me the correct values.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Below is the paritial output showing the issue with the intercept and LSMEANS.&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="1.png" style="width: 534px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/19012i633EEA17289217C2/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="1.png" alt="1.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="2.png" style="width: 524px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/19011i83F88C717B36D96E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="2.png" alt="2.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="3.png" style="width: 519px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/19014i71FA06FF5F89B285/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="3.png" alt="3.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="4.png" style="width: 495px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/19013i74321EF090C768A1/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="4.png" alt="4.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can anyone explain what is happening. I'm completely perplexed at this point. I would expect to get positive LSMEANS for parasitism rates..&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 01:55:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Issues-with-Proc-GLIMMIX-Intercept-LSmeans/m-p/443128#M23295</guid>
      <dc:creator>Nebulus</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-07T01:55:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with Proc GLIMMIX Intercept/LSmeans</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Issues-with-Proc-GLIMMIX-Intercept-LSmeans/m-p/443161#M23296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Moved to "SAS Procedures" forum.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 02:41:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Issues-with-Proc-GLIMMIX-Intercept-LSmeans/m-p/443161#M23296</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisNZ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-07T02:41:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Issues with Proc GLIMMIX Intercept/LSmeans</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Issues-with-Proc-GLIMMIX-Intercept-LSmeans/m-p/443253#M23297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;These are on the logit scale. You need to un-transform the results.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2018 12:00:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Issues-with-Proc-GLIMMIX-Intercept-LSmeans/m-p/443253#M23297</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-03-07T12:00:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

