<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proc Mixed by Feeding Period in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-by-Feeding-Period/m-p/440626#M23219</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;We don't know your data. We don't know if the interaction is important or significant. If you think it might be important or significant, you need to include it in the model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I were you, I would put PERIOD and TRT*PERIOD into the model initially, and not use the BY statement. You also want to have day nested within period&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:41:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-02-27T18:41:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc Mixed by Feeding Period</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-by-Feeding-Period/m-p/440539#M23218</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Lamb feeding trial designed as follows:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*Lambs placed into individual pens (experimental unit = lamb ID) and remained in the pen throughout the trial&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*Lambs fed for 84 day, using 2 feeding periods (diet changed going into Period 2). Period 1 (days 0 to 28); Period 2 (days 29 to 84)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;*On day 0 and multiple times during each period (e.g., d 0, 14, 28; 29, 50, &amp;amp; 84), various things are measured; e.g., body weight (BW), BW gain...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Questions:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; Can data be analyzed by Period without worrying about/checking for a trt x period interaction (evaluate by period even if interaction is not signif.)? I like this method because of the differences we see at times, where 1 trt does poorly during Period 1 but then "rebounds" in Period 2 and catches up to the others.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PROC&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;MIXED&lt;/STRONG&gt;; by Period;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CLASS ID TRT DAY;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; MODEL BW = TRT day TRT*day;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; REPEATED DAY / SUBJECT=ID TYPE = XXX;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;2. Or, can I just analyze without including period anywhere in the model; just use day?&amp;nbsp; Will the meaning of the results be confounding if I examine effects over different Periods? For example, lambs with less BW gain early in the feeding period may go through accelerated gain in Period 2 and that greater ADG may not be because of the feeding period but because of the previous ADG.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; PROC MIXED;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; CLASS TRT DAY ID;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; MODEL BW = TRT&amp;nbsp; DAY&amp;nbsp; TRTxDay / XXX;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; REPEATED DAY/SUBJECT=ID TYPE = XXX&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 15:57:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-by-Feeding-Period/m-p/440539#M23218</guid>
      <dc:creator>AgReseach7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-27T15:57:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc Mixed by Feeding Period</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-by-Feeding-Period/m-p/440626#M23219</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;We don't know your data. We don't know if the interaction is important or significant. If you think it might be important or significant, you need to include it in the model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If I were you, I would put PERIOD and TRT*PERIOD into the model initially, and not use the BY statement. You also want to have day nested within period&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 18:41:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-by-Feeding-Period/m-p/440626#M23219</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-02-27T18:41:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

