<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Not equal volume in Deciles - Logistic Regression in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/429924#M22601</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am doing the logistic regression and ranking the final output. In the output, when I rank the observations into deciles, I dont get equal number of obs in each decile. Infact, in some deciles its as low as 35 and highest in a decile is 150. I understand the ranking is done based on predicticted probabilities, but I am wondering is this an indication of wrong prediction or ranking as most of the obs have exactly same prediction score?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can it be becuase I am using a very few predictors&amp;nbsp; (4 to 5) and all of them are categorical, hence many obs have exactly same predicted probabilities?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks as always.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sachin&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sachin01663</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-01-23T09:35:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Not equal volume in Deciles - Logistic Regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/429924#M22601</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am doing the logistic regression and ranking the final output. In the output, when I rank the observations into deciles, I dont get equal number of obs in each decile. Infact, in some deciles its as low as 35 and highest in a decile is 150. I understand the ranking is done based on predicticted probabilities, but I am wondering is this an indication of wrong prediction or ranking as most of the obs have exactly same prediction score?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can it be becuase I am using a very few predictors&amp;nbsp; (4 to 5) and all of them are categorical, hence many obs have exactly same predicted probabilities?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks as always.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sachin&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:35:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/429924#M22601</guid>
      <dc:creator>sachin01663</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-23T09:35:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not equal volume in Deciles - Logistic Regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/429972#M22602</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How are you doing the ranking? Are there ties in the data?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 13:17:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/429972#M22602</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-23T13:17:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not equal volume in Deciles - Logistic Regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/430041#M22605</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/4910"&gt;@sachin01663&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am doing the logistic regression and ranking the final output. In the output, when I rank the observations into deciles, I dont get equal number of obs in each decile. Infact, in some deciles its as low as 35 and highest in a decile is 150. I understand the ranking is done based on predicticted probabilities, but I am wondering is this an indication of wrong prediction or ranking as most of the obs have exactly same prediction score?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Can it be becuase I am using a very few predictors&amp;nbsp; (4 to 5) and all of them are categorical, hence many obs have exactly same predicted probabilities?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Thanks as always.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sachin&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How are you ranking "the final output"? It might help to show the code used.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/430041#M22605</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-23T15:43:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not equal volume in Deciles - Logistic Regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/430046#M22606</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Can it be becuase I am using a very few predictors&amp;nbsp; (4 to 5) and all of them are categorical, hence many obs have exactly same predicted probabilities?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Yes, if you have few predictors that are all categorical you only have a few values.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For example, if you have 3 predictors with 3 levels each, then you have&amp;nbsp; a total of 3*3 = 9 possible predicted values total.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:48:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/430046#M22606</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-23T15:48:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not equal volume in Deciles - Logistic Regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/430129#M22612</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There is no reason to expect that the decile groups, determined using the predicted probabilities, will have equal sizes. It is not an indication of any problem.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:36:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/430129#M22612</guid>
      <dc:creator>StatDave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-23T19:36:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Not equal volume in Deciles - Logistic Regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/431822#M22712</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks everyone.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I was expecting the same as I have very few predictors with less levels hence&amp;nbsp;quite a few&amp;nbsp;customers are getting same probability score.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Appreciate your time !!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sachin&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2018 15:58:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Not-equal-volume-in-Deciles-Logistic-Regression/m-p/431822#M22712</guid>
      <dc:creator>sachin01663</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-01-29T15:58:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

