<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: coding within proc logist in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/coding-within-proc-logist/m-p/419858#M22096</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It’s included in the first part of the output, reread it carefully, if you can’t find it post your output. Also, it’s LOGISTIC.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 21:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-12-09T21:05:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>coding within proc logist</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/coding-within-proc-logist/m-p/419854#M22095</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using SAS 9.4 full edition. I have some missing data for some covariates and would like to determine the N upon which the model is being based (some patients might have missing data for all the covariates or different patients might have different variables missing). I don't see anywhere on the SAS output that mentions the final N that is used. Do you have to program it to give you this result?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Laura&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 20:46:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/coding-within-proc-logist/m-p/419854#M22095</guid>
      <dc:creator>lmyers2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-09T20:46:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: coding within proc logist</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/coding-within-proc-logist/m-p/419858#M22096</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It’s included in the first part of the output, reread it carefully, if you can’t find it post your output. Also, it’s LOGISTIC.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 21:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/coding-within-proc-logist/m-p/419858#M22096</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-09T21:05:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: coding within proc logist</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/coding-within-proc-logist/m-p/419863#M22097</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Screen Shot 2017-12-09 at 3.38.32 PM.png" style="width: 600px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/17120i6EC8C7DF32484267/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Screen Shot 2017-12-09 at 3.38.32 PM.png" alt="Screen Shot 2017-12-09 at 3.38.32 PM.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2017 22:39:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/coding-within-proc-logist/m-p/419863#M22097</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-12-09T22:39:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

