<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic multiple strata factors in CMH test in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/multiple-strata-factors-in-CMH-test/m-p/417469#M21932</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have three strata factors (age group, disease stage, sex) and when I want to do CMH test, someone told me&amp;nbsp;that I have to put all three strata factors together, which give insignificant p value:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc freq data=mydata;
    table agegr *&amp;nbsp;sex * dis_stag* trt_arm *&amp;nbsp;resp / cmh;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but when I put the strata factors one by one, I found two of them (age group and disease stage) gave significant p value for a certain subgroup.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;table agegr * trt_arm * resp / cmh;
or 
table  dis_stag* trt_arm * resp / cmh;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now the question is, can I analyze the data using only one strata, knowing that both the experiment was designed and subjects were randomized&amp;nbsp;based on all 3 strata factors?&amp;nbsp; Is using all three strata factors in CMH more defend-able than using only one strata factors?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:30:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>fengyuwuzu</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-30T16:30:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>multiple strata factors in CMH test</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/multiple-strata-factors-in-CMH-test/m-p/417469#M21932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have three strata factors (age group, disease stage, sex) and when I want to do CMH test, someone told me&amp;nbsp;that I have to put all three strata factors together, which give insignificant p value:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc freq data=mydata;
    table agegr *&amp;nbsp;sex * dis_stag* trt_arm *&amp;nbsp;resp / cmh;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but when I put the strata factors one by one, I found two of them (age group and disease stage) gave significant p value for a certain subgroup.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;table agegr * trt_arm * resp / cmh;
or 
table  dis_stag* trt_arm * resp / cmh;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now the question is, can I analyze the data using only one strata, knowing that both the experiment was designed and subjects were randomized&amp;nbsp;based on all 3 strata factors?&amp;nbsp; Is using all three strata factors in CMH more defend-able than using only one strata factors?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 16:30:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/multiple-strata-factors-in-CMH-test/m-p/417469#M21932</guid>
      <dc:creator>fengyuwuzu</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-30T16:30:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: multiple strata factors in CMH test</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/multiple-strata-factors-in-CMH-test/m-p/417581#M21942</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think CMH tests are more about the same experiment done multiple times or on multiple sets of data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.biostathandbook.com/cmh.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.biostathandbook.com/cmh.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the force is weak in this one and for sure I cannot say.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It sounds like you've stratified a group into different buckets and want to know about the differences in the buckets.&amp;nbsp; I don't know if that is a CMH thing. If you're just looking at difference between buckets, I would think you could collapse buckets down and practically be in Chi square country.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But a number of years since I did any serious stats it has been.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2017 21:33:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/multiple-strata-factors-in-CMH-test/m-p/417581#M21942</guid>
      <dc:creator>HB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-30T21:33:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

