<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PCA programming in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411683#M21577</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It sure sounds to me like the original question leads to the answer of Partial Least Squares regression.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There's no need to perform PCA on the x-variables and a separate PCA on the y-variables, because these two PCAs might find results that are largely uncorrelated with one another. PLS overcomes this problem by finding dimensions of y that are well predicted (at least, as well as the data will allow) by dimensions of x.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 20:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-08T20:33:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PCA programming</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411530#M21565</link>
      <description>In PCA whether to extract the components of the independent variables or both dependent and independent variables.&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 14:45:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411530#M21565</guid>
      <dc:creator>Aamirkhan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T14:45:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PCA programming</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411539#M21566</link>
      <description>Aamirkhan,&lt;BR /&gt;There is a simple correlation you should understand when posting a code-related question:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;The probability of an answer is proportional to the amount of background information, SAS code, log and output you post with your question!</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:15:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411539#M21566</guid>
      <dc:creator>hollandnumerics</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T15:15:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PCA programming</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411542#M21567</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Please provide more information on your problem..&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:19:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411542#M21567</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterClemmensen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T15:19:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PCA programming</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411551#M21568</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Strictly speaking, PCA does not&amp;nbsp;involve a dependent variable. It is a way to choose linear combinations of variables that explain the most variance in the data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You are probably talking about Principle Component Regression (PCR). Most people use PCR to mean "extract components from only the independent variables.&amp;nbsp; You can read about &lt;A href="https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2017/10/23/principal-component-regression-sas.html" target="_self"&gt;how to run a principal component regression in SAS.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Although I have answered the question you asked, I want to point out that&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2017/10/25/principal-component-regression-drawbacks.html" target="_self"&gt;there are statistical&amp;nbsp;drawbacks with this definition of principal component regression,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;The better approach, IMHO, is to use &lt;A href="http://bit.ly/2x368wD" target="_self"&gt;PROC PLS&lt;/A&gt; to perform partial least squares regression. PLS uses the independent AND the dependent variables to form the components that best explain the variation in BOTH the response and the explanatory variables.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 15:47:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411551#M21568</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T15:47:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PCA programming</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411683#M21577</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It sure sounds to me like the original question leads to the answer of Partial Least Squares regression.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There's no need to perform PCA on the x-variables and a separate PCA on the y-variables, because these two PCAs might find results that are largely uncorrelated with one another. PLS overcomes this problem by finding dimensions of y that are well predicted (at least, as well as the data will allow) by dimensions of x.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 20:33:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PCA-programming/m-p/411683#M21577</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-08T20:33:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

