<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Uknown SAS procedure for comparing observed (Kaplan Meier) and predicted (Cox) risk in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409989#M21416</link>
    <description>I gotta run, but re-read your question. Once the risks are grouped, take a look at NPAR1WAY proc.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:48:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-11-02T19:48:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Uknown SAS procedure for comparing observed (Kaplan Meier) and predicted (Cox) risk</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409954#M21407</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to replicate the below methods, but I am lost on the SAS code/procedures needed to reproduce the &lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;bolded&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;section. I have searched Google and chat rooms and other SAS sites for hours and have come up with half fixes every time or code that doesn't run. I am at a loss and now on a time crunch. Any assistance would be GREATLY appreciated. Thank you in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P align="left"&gt;&lt;FONT face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;"Two-thirds of the study participants (n ¼ 10,039) were&amp;nbsp;randomly assigned to a derivation cohort for the development of risk prediction models with computer-generated random numbers, &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;and the remaining one-third (n ¼ 5019) were reserved as an independent validation cohort. Among the patients allocated to the derivation cohort, new risk prediction models for all-cause and &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;cardiovascular death were developed by using multivariable Cox proportional hazards models including the above-mentioned risk &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;factors. In these models, survival analysis was censored at last date of follow-up or date of death. The performance of each risk prediction model was tested among either the patients assigned to the derivation or the validation cohort. The ability of each model to &lt;FONT face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#000000"&gt;discriminate patients who died within 5 years from surviving patients was evaluated using the c-statistic for the survival analysis&lt;/FONT&gt;. &lt;FONT color="#0000ff"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Observed risk (based on the Kaplan-Meier product limit method) and predicted risk (based on the risk prediction model) of each outcome at 5 years were compared by ranking participants into deciles of predicted risk,&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;/FONT&gt;and calibration of each model was evaluated in the derivation cohort using a modified Hosmer-Lemeshow c2-statistic with 9 degree of freedom. In addition, the risk prediction&amp;nbsp;model for each outcome was translated into a simple score sheet in the same way as described in the Framingham Heart Study.22 All statistical analyses were performed with SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Two-sided values of P &amp;lt; 0.05 were considered &lt;FONT face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"&gt;statistically significant."&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 18:10:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409954#M21407</guid>
      <dc:creator>chelseaxxlutz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-02T18:10:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Uknown SAS procedure for comparing observed (Kaplan Meier) and predicted (Cox) risk</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409981#M21412</link>
      <description>PROC LIFETEST and/or PROC PHREG</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:36:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409981#M21412</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-02T19:36:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Uknown SAS procedure for comparing observed (Kaplan Meier) and predicted (Cox) risk</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409984#M21413</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Reeza,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you. I know the procedures for proc lifetest and phreg and have run them successfully. What I'm asking is how do I compare the two risks (observed and predicted) ranked into deciles of risk? Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:45:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409984#M21413</guid>
      <dc:creator>chelseaxxlutz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-02T19:45:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Uknown SAS procedure for comparing observed (Kaplan Meier) and predicted (Cox) risk</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409987#M21415</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would assume at that point it's just a count of data, so wouldn't it be a Chi square test? The output in the paper should clarify that but I don't have time to read it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:47:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409987#M21415</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-02T19:47:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Uknown SAS procedure for comparing observed (Kaplan Meier) and predicted (Cox) risk</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409989#M21416</link>
      <description>I gotta run, but re-read your question. Once the risks are grouped, take a look at NPAR1WAY proc.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:48:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Uknown-SAS-procedure-for-comparing-observed-Kaplan-Meier-and/m-p/409989#M21416</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-11-02T19:48:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

