<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Nocollapse in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nocollapse/m-p/408368#M21259</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok this pointed me in the right direction. I found that collapsing was used while the data was being made, so therefore I would use the nocollapse option. I had someone else look at the data to help me on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2017 17:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sasnewbie12</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-29T17:52:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Nocollapse</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nocollapse/m-p/401426#M20934</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am new to SAS, and running analysis on survey data, SAS 9.4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I run a survey regression procedure, it&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;automatically collapses the strata that contain a single sampling unit into a pooled stratum, and gives me a blue message in the log; it also suggests using the NOCOLLAPSE option to avoid collapsing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I tried the proc with and without the Nocollapse option and received different p-values.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it more statistically accurate to leave the default sas method of collapsing, or should I use the Nocollapse option?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:20:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nocollapse/m-p/401426#M20934</guid>
      <dc:creator>sasnewbie12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-05T16:20:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nocollapse</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nocollapse/m-p/401430#M20935</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/169765"&gt;@sasnewbie12&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am new to SAS, and running analysis on survey data, SAS 9.4.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I run a survey regression procedure, it&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;automatically collapses the strata that contain a single sampling unit into a pooled stratum, and gives me a blue message in the log; it also suggests using the NOCOLLAPSE option to avoid collapsing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I tried the proc with and without the Nocollapse option and received different p-values.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is it more statistically accurate to leave the default sas method of collapsing, or should I use the Nocollapse option?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thank you&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's usually important to consider the context of the strata's that are being combined.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PS. I'm moving this to the Stats forum.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:24:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nocollapse/m-p/401430#M20935</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-05T16:24:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nocollapse</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nocollapse/m-p/401440#M20936</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You will likely get different p-values as the option is going to affect variance calculations. The collapsing is in effect "borrowing" some data variance from another strata.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Your data and study design should tell whether or not the nocollapse option is appropriate. The planning should indicate why a strata has a single sampling unit and any concerns about that strata for the analysis.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 16:53:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nocollapse/m-p/401440#M20936</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-05T16:53:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Nocollapse</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nocollapse/m-p/408368#M21259</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ok this pointed me in the right direction. I found that collapsing was used while the data was being made, so therefore I would use the nocollapse option. I had someone else look at the data to help me on this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2017 17:52:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Nocollapse/m-p/408368#M21259</guid>
      <dc:creator>sasnewbie12</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-29T17:52:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

