<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard e in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/404857#M21113</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If multicollinearity&amp;nbsp;reflects high correlation between an interaction term (e.g., X1*X2) and its lower-level components (e.g., X1 and X2), then centering the continuous predictor variables (X1 and X2) and then computing the interaction variable will help. See&amp;nbsp;&lt;A title="Key Results of Interaction Models With Centering" href="http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v19n3/afshartous.pdf" target="_self"&gt;http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v19n3/afshartous.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Centering will not address collinearity between X1 and X2; that correlation would be a fundamental characteristic of the data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sld</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-17T16:08:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard error</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/404753#M21106</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am a PhD student. I am facing the problem of multicollinearity (VIF&amp;gt;10) and I can't drop the variables. The problem is arising due to the use of interaction terms. While searching for the solution, I came to know about the ridge regression and used the following sas code:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc reg data=OBJ.OBJ1 outvif&lt;BR /&gt;outest=vif ridge=0 to 0.05 by .002;&lt;BR /&gt;model WCRATIO= wcs BGDUM WIO INTPROMBG INTPROMIO intbgio Wsize Wpbratio Wcfota WCFVOLSD Wcapex WnwctaCASHMS Wlev dd wrdsales;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;BR /&gt;proc print data=vif;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it is giving the output but without standard error, t-value and p-value. To report the output table for my thesis, I need the t value. How can I get the required information for my thesis.&lt;BR /&gt;I am attaching the screenshot of the output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help. It will be really grateful to get the t-value otherwise I will not be able to use this output because there is no way to tell whether coefficients are significant.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Rajneesh Jha&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:07:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/404753#M21106</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajneesh_Jha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-18T04:07:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard e</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/404759#M21107</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'd like to look at your output, but many people (including me) will not download MS Office documents because it is a security risk. If you have a screen capture, please put it in a PDF or GIF.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When I run &lt;A href="http://documentation.sas.com/?cdcId=pgmmvacdc&amp;amp;cdcVersion=9.4&amp;amp;docsetId=statug&amp;amp;docsetTarget=statug_reg_examples05.htm&amp;amp;locale=en" target="_self"&gt;example code&lt;/A&gt; from the SAS Documentation, I see the t-values without problem.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 12:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/404759#M21107</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-17T12:24:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard e</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/404798#M21112</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think Paige is seeing the standard errors and p-values for the unridged case. The OP is correct that the standard errors and p-values are not produced for ridge regression. If they are important, you would need to &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/24/982.html" target="_self"&gt;generate bootstrap samples and use the bootstrap distribution to determine if the estimates are significant.&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;Bootstrap estimates for regression coefficients can be tricky, so I suggest you discuss the issue with your advisor.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:08:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/404798#M21112</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-17T14:08:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard e</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/404857#M21113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If multicollinearity&amp;nbsp;reflects high correlation between an interaction term (e.g., X1*X2) and its lower-level components (e.g., X1 and X2), then centering the continuous predictor variables (X1 and X2) and then computing the interaction variable will help. See&amp;nbsp;&lt;A title="Key Results of Interaction Models With Centering" href="http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v19n3/afshartous.pdf" target="_self"&gt;http://ww2.amstat.org/publications/jse/v19n3/afshartous.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Centering will not address collinearity between X1 and X2; that correlation would be a fundamental characteristic of the data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:08:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/404857#M21113</guid>
      <dc:creator>sld</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-17T16:08:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard e</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405091#M21118</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I checked the example code but i did not find t value. The output from example code is similar to what i am getting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am also attaching the PDF for reference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank You.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:03:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405091#M21118</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajneesh_Jha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-18T04:03:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard e</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405094#M21119</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I used this method also(centering) but VIF was still high. It may be due to the interaction with dummy variable.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:10:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405094#M21119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajneesh_Jha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-18T04:10:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard e</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405096#M21120</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It means in ridge regression i will not get SE, t value and p value?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The bootstrap link seems to be very complicated to me.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please suggest me something simpler, if possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 04:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405096#M21120</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajneesh_Jha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-18T04:17:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard e</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405164#M21123</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Sir,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I found standard error in ridge regression and using that i can calculate t value.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;using outseb in the code after outvif, output is giving standard error.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But now, I want to know how can I report model fit like F value, adjusted R square, etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can I use anova table of unridged regression and beta estimates and t value of ridge regression?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please suggest over this.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:56:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405164#M21123</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rajneesh_Jha</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-18T10:56:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Using ridge regression to remove multicollinearity problem but not getting t-value or standard e</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405173#M21124</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Excellent! I thought I had tested that option, but clearly I was wrong. For completeness, here is how you get standard errors in the OUTEST= data set:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc reg data=sashelp.cars plots=none 
         outest=PE outseb ridge=(0 to 0.5 by 0.1);
   model mpg_city = Weight enginesize horsepower wheelbase / VIF;
quit;

proc print data=PE(where=(_TYPE_ contains "RIDGE")); 
   var _TYPE_ _RIDGE_ Intercept--Wheelbase;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2017 12:05:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Using-ridge-regression-to-remove-multicollinearity-problem-but/m-p/405173#M21124</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-18T12:05:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

