<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic interpretation and inclusion of interaction terms in regression model in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpretation-and-inclusion-of-interaction-terms-in-regression/m-p/404288#M21081</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;have a 3-way interaction model as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Y = A + B + C + A*B + A*C + B*C + A*B*C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A is a dummy and B and C are centred continuous variables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am mainly interested in the parameters for B&lt;EM&gt;C and B. The interpretation of these parameters depends on the inclusion of A&lt;/EM&gt;B*C and all 2-way interactions. I am using SAS and PROC GLMSELECT with selection=none, thus (IMHO) forcing the interactions to be included?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For some data the p-values for the aforementioned interactions are above 0.05. Does that mean they are not ‘included’ and thus the interpretation of the aforementioned parameters changes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any feedback would be very much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2017 10:55:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>csetzkorn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-10-15T10:55:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>interpretation and inclusion of interaction terms in regression model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpretation-and-inclusion-of-interaction-terms-in-regression/m-p/404288#M21081</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;have a 3-way interaction model as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Y = A + B + C + A*B + A*C + B*C + A*B*C&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A is a dummy and B and C are centred continuous variables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am mainly interested in the parameters for B&lt;EM&gt;C and B. The interpretation of these parameters depends on the inclusion of A&lt;/EM&gt;B*C and all 2-way interactions. I am using SAS and PROC GLMSELECT with selection=none, thus (IMHO) forcing the interactions to be included?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For some data the p-values for the aforementioned interactions are above 0.05. Does that mean they are not ‘included’ and thus the interpretation of the aforementioned parameters changes?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any feedback would be very much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2017 10:55:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpretation-and-inclusion-of-interaction-terms-in-regression/m-p/404288#M21081</guid>
      <dc:creator>csetzkorn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-15T10:55:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: interpretation and inclusion of interaction terms in regression model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpretation-and-inclusion-of-interaction-terms-in-regression/m-p/404435#M21098</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm not quite sure what your are trying to do.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you must have "&lt;EM&gt;A&lt;/EM&gt;B*C and all 2-way interactions" in the model, then it sound like you must include everything in the model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The P values are only indicating where you might like to make changes to the model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember, if you include higher terms then you should include the lower terms (e.g. include A and B if you are going to keep A*B).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:02:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpretation-and-inclusion-of-interaction-terms-in-regression/m-p/404435#M21098</guid>
      <dc:creator>Norman21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-16T12:02:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: interpretation and inclusion of interaction terms in regression model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpretation-and-inclusion-of-interaction-terms-in-regression/m-p/404438#M21099</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For some data the p-values for the aforementioned interactions are above 0.05. Does that mean they are not ‘included’ and thus the interpretation of the aforementioned parameters changes?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You will find statisticians who advise removing terms from the model where the p-values are above 0.05. You will find statisticians who advise the opposite. I find myself in the group who advises you to not remove these terms from the model.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Removing terms from the model requires you to re-fit the model, and yes then not only the interpretation of the model changes but the coefficients change as well.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As the other commenter said, if you include B*C in the model, then you need to make sure B and C individually are included.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:11:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/interpretation-and-inclusion-of-interaction-terms-in-regression/m-p/404438#M21099</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-10-16T12:11:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

