<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proc surveylogistic regression goodness-of-fit test in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387454#M20181</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Currently, the only available goodness-of-fit tests in PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC are found in the default output in the &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/68162/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_surveylogistic_details64.htm" target="_self"&gt;Model Fit Statistics and "Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0" tables. &lt;/A&gt; This is really a limitation with logit models in general on complex survey data in that there are not a lot of measures that can be used to assess fit that are defined. &amp;nbsp;The Hosmer-Lemeshow test, for example, has been shown to be inappropriate in complex sample designs. This is discussed in the following reference&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers/1997_026.pdf" target="new"&gt;http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers/1997_026.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SAS_Rob</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-08-11T18:20:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc surveylogistic regression goodness-of-fit test</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387312#M20172</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to find an appropriate goodness-of-fit test for proc surveylogistic procedure. Could you please help me with that? Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 12:47:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387312#M20172</guid>
      <dc:creator>shovakc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T12:47:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc surveylogistic regression goodness-of-fit test</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387454#M20181</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Currently, the only available goodness-of-fit tests in PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC are found in the default output in the &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/68162/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_surveylogistic_details64.htm" target="_self"&gt;Model Fit Statistics and "Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0" tables. &lt;/A&gt; This is really a limitation with logit models in general on complex survey data in that there are not a lot of measures that can be used to assess fit that are defined. &amp;nbsp;The Hosmer-Lemeshow test, for example, has been shown to be inappropriate in complex sample designs. This is discussed in the following reference&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers/1997_026.pdf" target="new"&gt;http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/papers/1997_026.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:20:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387454#M20181</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS_Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T18:20:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc surveylogistic regression goodness-of-fit test</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387455#M20182</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your reply. I tried clicking on the link for the reference and was redirected to this website:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="http://www.amstat.org/ASA/Membership/Sections-and-Interest-Groups.aspx" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.amstat.org/ASA/Membership/Sections-and-Interest-Groups.aspx&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is there another way to get this paper? Maybe it requires subscription to Amstat to access the paper. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2017 18:29:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387455#M20182</guid>
      <dc:creator>shovakc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-11T18:29:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc surveylogistic regression goodness-of-fit test</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387733#M20185</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Looks liek the link has changed...try this one instead&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/papers/1997_026.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://ww2.amstat.org/sections/srms/Proceedings/papers/1997_026.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 11:55:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387733#M20185</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS_Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-14T11:55:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc surveylogistic regression goodness-of-fit test</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387893#M20201</link>
      <description>Thank you for the link. Do you know if SUDAAN or any other software that provides goodness-of-fit test for logistic regression of complex survey data?&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2017 17:56:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/387893#M20201</guid>
      <dc:creator>shovakc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-08-14T17:56:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc surveylogistic regression goodness-of-fit test</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/397168#M20708</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Are the statistics reported in the default output for model fitness adjusted to account for complex sample surveys? Would really appreciate that information.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 15:33:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/397168#M20708</guid>
      <dc:creator>shovakc</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-19T15:33:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc surveylogistic regression goodness-of-fit test</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/397184#M20710</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;No,&amp;nbsp;those statistics I mentioned are all likelihood based which would not include any adjustments to the variance for the sampling.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/68162/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_surveylogistic_details06.htm&amp;nbsp;" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/68162/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_surveylogistic_details06.htm&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 16:11:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveylogistic-regression-goodness-of-fit-test/m-p/397184#M20710</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS_Rob</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-19T16:11:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

