<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: surveylogistic fails to converge in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/surveylogistic-fails-to-converge/m-p/45446#M1992</link>
    <description>Hi wong,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I suggest identifying predictor/predictors that cause quasi-separation and removing them from the model.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Olga</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:25:24 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>statsplank</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-17T16:25:24Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>surveylogistic fails to converge</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/surveylogistic-fails-to-converge/m-p/45445#M1991</link>
      <description>Hi all.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
What should I do in order to get finite odds ratios? I'm using&lt;BR /&gt;
surveylogistic in order to take into account the clustering effect but&lt;BR /&gt;
it failed to converge due to quasi-separation.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Please give me some guidance.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks heaps in advance.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:42:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/surveylogistic-fails-to-converge/m-p/45445#M1991</guid>
      <dc:creator>Miracle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-17T11:42:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: surveylogistic fails to converge</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/surveylogistic-fails-to-converge/m-p/45446#M1992</link>
      <description>Hi wong,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I suggest identifying predictor/predictors that cause quasi-separation and removing them from the model.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;
Olga</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:25:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/surveylogistic-fails-to-converge/m-p/45446#M1992</guid>
      <dc:creator>statsplank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-17T16:25:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: surveylogistic fails to converge</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/surveylogistic-fails-to-converge/m-p/45447#M1993</link>
      <description>hi Olga.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'd prefer not do that. Is there any other better approach to address this?&lt;BR /&gt;
As I know, SAS9.2 proc logistic now has penalized maximum likelihood which can overcome this problem but it cannot be applied in my case since I have to take into account the clustering effect of the individuals from the same household.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
cheers</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:44:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/surveylogistic-fails-to-converge/m-p/45447#M1993</guid>
      <dc:creator>Miracle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-24T03:44:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

