<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: ordinal response and ordinal independent variables in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/ordinal-response-and-ordinal-independent-variables/m-p/378527#M19872</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;For background info on (quasi-)complete separation, see:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Usage Note 22599: Understanding and correcting complete or quasi-complete separation problems&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/22/599.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/kb/22/599.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But&amp;nbsp;even when you have a separation condition, the resulting model can be quite good at classifying observations. Check this on a holdout dataset! Holdout dataset = independent observations with known outcome but never seen by the model while training it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However when&amp;nbsp;you have a separation condition, the resulting model cannot be interpreted. Inference about regression coefficients and odds ratios should be avoided, because maximum likelihood estimates for the model parameters do not exist.&amp;nbsp;You simply treat the model as if it is produced by an uninterpretable machine learning algorithm (like neural nets).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What can you do to avoid the separation condition?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Collapsing levels of categorical variables and binning interval variables are commonly used techniques to deal with separation condition.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Good luck,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Koen&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Brussels&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2017 12:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-07-23T12:33:09Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ordinal response and ordinal independent variables</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/ordinal-response-and-ordinal-independent-variables/m-p/378507#M19870</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have an ordinal independent variable&amp;nbsp;and ordinal response variable. I used PRoc logistic and checked score test for proportional odds. It did not hold true. Therefore I resorted to Generalized logit. But it gives me the following warning:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The validity of the model fit is questionable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the log says the following:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;There is possibly a quasi-complete separation of data points. The maximum likelihood&lt;BR /&gt;estimate may not exist.&lt;BR /&gt;WARNING: The LOGISTIC procedure continues in spite of the above warning. Results shown are based&lt;BR /&gt;on the last maximum likelihood iteration. The validity of the model fit is questionable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What would be an appropriate way to get an outcome?&amp;nbsp;Or is there any way by which i can eliminate the above errors?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2017 08:22:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/ordinal-response-and-ordinal-independent-variables/m-p/378507#M19870</guid>
      <dc:creator>Asquared</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-23T08:22:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ordinal response and ordinal independent variables</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/ordinal-response-and-ordinal-independent-variables/m-p/378527#M19872</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For background info on (quasi-)complete separation, see:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Usage Note 22599: Understanding and correcting complete or quasi-complete separation problems&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/kb/22/599.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://support.sas.com/kb/22/599.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But&amp;nbsp;even when you have a separation condition, the resulting model can be quite good at classifying observations. Check this on a holdout dataset! Holdout dataset = independent observations with known outcome but never seen by the model while training it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;However when&amp;nbsp;you have a separation condition, the resulting model cannot be interpreted. Inference about regression coefficients and odds ratios should be avoided, because maximum likelihood estimates for the model parameters do not exist.&amp;nbsp;You simply treat the model as if it is produced by an uninterpretable machine learning algorithm (like neural nets).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What can you do to avoid the separation condition?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Collapsing levels of categorical variables and binning interval variables are commonly used techniques to deal with separation condition.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Good luck,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Koen&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Brussels&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2017 12:33:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/ordinal-response-and-ordinal-independent-variables/m-p/378527#M19872</guid>
      <dc:creator>sbxkoenk</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-07-23T12:33:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

