<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic PROC AUTOREG with HETERO and AUTOCORRELATION in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-AUTOREG-with-HETERO-and-AUTOCORRELATION/m-p/44297#M1947</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correcting for heteroskedasticity using the HETERO statement after the MODEL statement.&amp;nbsp; My problem is I cannot figure a way to test for autorcorrelation in this model.&amp;nbsp; Without the HETERO statement /dw will give the durbin-watson.&amp;nbsp; My understanding is that the GARCH model is the only way to correct for both.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:48:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GlenGold</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-02T19:48:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC AUTOREG with HETERO and AUTOCORRELATION</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-AUTOREG-with-HETERO-and-AUTOCORRELATION/m-p/44297#M1947</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Correcting for heteroskedasticity using the HETERO statement after the MODEL statement.&amp;nbsp; My problem is I cannot figure a way to test for autorcorrelation in this model.&amp;nbsp; Without the HETERO statement /dw will give the durbin-watson.&amp;nbsp; My understanding is that the GARCH model is the only way to correct for both.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 19:48:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-AUTOREG-with-HETERO-and-AUTOCORRELATION/m-p/44297#M1947</guid>
      <dc:creator>GlenGold</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-02T19:48:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC AUTOREG with HETERO and AUTOCORRELATION</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-AUTOREG-with-HETERO-and-AUTOCORRELATION/m-p/44298#M1948</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello - not sure if this helps, but this statement from documention might be useful: "For heteroscedastic regression models without GARCH effects, the errors &lt;IMG class="math gen" src="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/63939/HTML/default/images/etsug_autoreg0005.png" style="width: 10px; height: 10px; vertical-align: -2px;" /&gt; are assumed to be uncorrelated — the heteroscedasticity models specified by the HETERO statement cannot be combined with an autoregressive model for the errors. Thus, when a HETERO statement is used, the NLAG= option cannot be specified unless the GARCH= option is also specified." (&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/63939/HTML/default/viewer.htm#etsug_autoreg_sect015.htm"&gt;http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/63939/HTML/default/viewer.htm#etsug_autoreg_sect015.htm&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Udo&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:48:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-AUTOREG-with-HETERO-and-AUTOCORRELATION/m-p/44298#M1948</guid>
      <dc:creator>udo_sas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-02T21:48:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

