<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Meaning of significent in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Meaning-of-significent/m-p/354872#M18599</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes. The impact inside your model of Stage 1 is larger than Stage 3 (given alpha = 0.05). I am guessing that the significance in this case reffers to t-testing your coefficients=0, in which case for all three stages, you reject the null hypothesis of the three stages having no impact on your response variable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 05:43:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PeterClemmensen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-05-01T05:43:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Meaning of significent</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Meaning-of-significent/m-p/354870#M18598</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have the following results and&amp;nbsp;I'm not sure about the conclusions.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am checking the impact of CEO in three stages. Stage 1,2 and 3. The results are as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stage 1 - 0.073 (p=0.05)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stage 2 - 0.02 (p=0.01)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Stage 3 - 0.058 (p&amp;lt;0.0001)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All are positive impact, but I am trying to understand the difference between stage 1 and 3. Stage 1 is 0.073 but p=0.05 and stage 3 is with less impact but with higher significent. Can I say that the CEO impact is higher in stage 1 even if it is in p=0.05?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 05:33:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Meaning-of-significent/m-p/354870#M18598</guid>
      <dc:creator>yael</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-01T05:33:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Meaning of significent</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Meaning-of-significent/m-p/354872#M18599</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes. The impact inside your model of Stage 1 is larger than Stage 3 (given alpha = 0.05). I am guessing that the significance in this case reffers to t-testing your coefficients=0, in which case for all three stages, you reject the null hypothesis of the three stages having no impact on your response variable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 05:43:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Meaning-of-significent/m-p/354872#M18599</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterClemmensen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-01T05:43:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Meaning of significent</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Meaning-of-significent/m-p/354886#M18600</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;
Use LSMEANS to check the mean between these two group.


&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 May 2017 10:32:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Meaning-of-significent/m-p/354886#M18600</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-01T10:32:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

