<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Proc Mixed - Covary a baseline value in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Covary-a-baseline-value/m-p/354329#M18552</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm hoping someone might be able to help me adjust the lsmeans for a baseline value. &amp;nbsp;That is, DV was measured 8 times: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 120 min, and 90 min, and we'd like to adjust the lsmeans for the baseline value (0 min). &amp;nbsp;Is this possible?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 03:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>eileenwright</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-28T03:37:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc Mixed - Covary a baseline value</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Covary-a-baseline-value/m-p/354329#M18552</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm hoping someone might be able to help me adjust the lsmeans for a baseline value. &amp;nbsp;That is, DV was measured 8 times: 0 min, 15 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min, 120 min, and 90 min, and we'd like to adjust the lsmeans for the baseline value (0 min). &amp;nbsp;Is this possible?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 03:37:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Covary-a-baseline-value/m-p/354329#M18552</guid>
      <dc:creator>eileenwright</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-28T03:37:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc Mixed - Covary a baseline value</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Covary-a-baseline-value/m-p/354331#M18553</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With option / AT time=0 ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2017 04:07:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Covary-a-baseline-value/m-p/354331#M18553</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-28T04:07:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc Mixed - Covary a baseline value</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Covary-a-baseline-value/m-p/355482#M18631</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;An analysis of covariance model might work, if what you want is to estimate the means at 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 minutes for a common value of baseline. (The baseline time=0 value would be the covariate.)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Because (presumably) of the repeated measures on a subject at 0, ..., 120 min, the model would be more complicated than your standard ANCOVA (which would have data for time=0 and time= a second value). In particular, the relationship between data at time 15 and time 0 might be stronger than the relationship between data at time 120 and time 0 because noise intrudes as time passes--in other words, the slope of the regression of the response on baseline (time=0) might decrease with later times.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is speculative and untested, but I would consider&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;proc glimmix data=have;&lt;BR /&gt;  class time subjectID;&lt;BR /&gt;  model response = time baseline time*baseline;&lt;BR /&gt;  random time / subject=subjectID type=&amp;lt;some covariance structure, maybe ar(1)&amp;gt; residual;&lt;BR /&gt;  lsmeans time / at mean; /* or some other value of baseline */&lt;BR /&gt;  run;&lt;/PRE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Issues to consider are&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-- the nature of the relationship between response and baseline at each time (e.g., linear)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-- an appropriate covariance structure for the repeated measures within a subject&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-- normality and homogeneity of variance (assuming normal distribution)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;-- what a sensible "common" value for baseline might be, in context&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Alternatively, you could compute a variable that represents deviance from baseline, either absolute (i.e., subtract the baseline value) or relative (e.g., divide by the baseline value). Or maybe a random coefficients model.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 05:44:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Covary-a-baseline-value/m-p/355482#M18631</guid>
      <dc:creator>sld</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-05-03T05:44:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

