<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Creating a meaninful composite outcome in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Creating-a-meaninful-composite-outcome/m-p/347967#M18282</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have some exam data for some middle school students, with 2 continuous outcomes i am interested in looking at&lt;BR /&gt;(1) exam score&lt;BR /&gt;(2) time it takes to complete the exam&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to combine these to 1 meaningful outcome variable (they have different scales and better is higher for score and lower for the time)? I want to compare the effect of a predictor and also look at differences in this association by county.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 01:11:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LucyB</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-07T01:11:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Creating a meaninful composite outcome</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Creating-a-meaninful-composite-outcome/m-p/347967#M18282</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have some exam data for some middle school students, with 2 continuous outcomes i am interested in looking at&lt;BR /&gt;(1) exam score&lt;BR /&gt;(2) time it takes to complete the exam&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to combine these to 1 meaningful outcome variable (they have different scales and better is higher for score and lower for the time)? I want to compare the effect of a predictor and also look at differences in this association by county.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 01:11:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Creating-a-meaninful-composite-outcome/m-p/347967#M18282</guid>
      <dc:creator>LucyB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-07T01:11:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Creating a meaninful composite outcome</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Creating-a-meaninful-composite-outcome/m-p/348055#M18285</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/133154"&gt;@LucyB&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I have some exam data for some middle school students, with 2 continuous outcomes i am interested in looking at&lt;BR /&gt;(1) exam score&lt;BR /&gt;(2) time it takes to complete the exam&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is it possible to combine these to 1 meaningful outcome variable (they have different scales and better is higher for score and lower for the time)? I want to compare the effect of a predictor and also look at differences in this association by county.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You will probably get many suggestions. My suggestion is to use a multivariate statistical method, such as MANOVA, which will form a linear combination (or perhaps two linear combinations)&amp;nbsp;of your 2 continuous outcomes; or Partial Least Squares Regression (which also will form one or two linear combinations of your 2 continuous outcomes).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm also&amp;nbsp;thinking that none of this is necessary in the case where you have only two response variables and two predictor. In the case where you have so few variables, it's easy to plot the variables against one another and multivariate methods are really overkill unless the two response variables are highly correlated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2017 12:04:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Creating-a-meaninful-composite-outcome/m-p/348055#M18285</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-07T12:04:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

