<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Paired t-test or wilcoxon signed rank for N=5 in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Paired-t-test-or-wilcoxon-signed-rank-for-N-5/m-p/343953#M18096</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Report the Wilcoxon signed rank test result. It is non parametric and the value reported by proc univariate is exact for samples of size &amp;lt; 20.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-24T03:28:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Paired t-test or wilcoxon signed rank for N=5</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Paired-t-test-or-wilcoxon-signed-rank-for-N-5/m-p/343945#M18090</link>
      <description>&lt;DIV class="post-text"&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have some pre post data for an extremely small sample (n=5). Outcome is continuous and no control. What statistics would be more appropriate to report? Accordingly, is a paired t-test or a wilcoxon signed rank test more appropriate?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel 5 data points are insufficient to assess normality. Should i report both?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:09:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Paired-t-test-or-wilcoxon-signed-rank-for-N-5/m-p/343945#M18090</guid>
      <dc:creator>LucyB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-24T03:09:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paired t-test or wilcoxon signed rank for N=5</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Paired-t-test-or-wilcoxon-signed-rank-for-N-5/m-p/343951#M18094</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Report mean and maybe direction of change? 5 is too small to make any generalizations - may even want to just report all the numbers. We summarize in first place because too much data to understand otherwise. 5 points don't have that issue.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:21:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Paired-t-test-or-wilcoxon-signed-rank-for-N-5/m-p/343951#M18094</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-24T03:21:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paired t-test or wilcoxon signed rank for N=5</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Paired-t-test-or-wilcoxon-signed-rank-for-N-5/m-p/343952#M18095</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So maybe a t-test and wilcoxon sign test?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:27:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Paired-t-test-or-wilcoxon-signed-rank-for-N-5/m-p/343952#M18095</guid>
      <dc:creator>LucyB</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-24T03:27:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Paired t-test or wilcoxon signed rank for N=5</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Paired-t-test-or-wilcoxon-signed-rank-for-N-5/m-p/343953#M18096</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Report the Wilcoxon signed rank test result. It is non parametric and the value reported by proc univariate is exact for samples of size &amp;lt; 20.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2017 03:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Paired-t-test-or-wilcoxon-signed-rank-for-N-5/m-p/343953#M18096</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-24T03:28:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

