<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC MIXED with RANDOM fails to ESTIMATE Random Effect coefficients in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-with-RANDOM-fails-to-ESTIMATE-Random-Effect/m-p/341824#M17969</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Is the MIXED procedure also telling you that the estimated G matrix is not positive definite?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Most likely, this result implies that there is little variation among &lt;EM&gt;rep&lt;/EM&gt;s for this response variable. The procedure has set the estimate to zero (hence, the SE is missing) and continued on its merry way. See Section III in this paper&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="Tips and Strategies for Mixed Modeling with SAS/STAT® Procedures " href="http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings12/332-2012.pdf" target="_self"&gt;http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings12/332-2012.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the documentation&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_mixed_sect028.htm" target="_self"&gt;https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_mixed_sect028.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;under Parameter Constraints, you'll find:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"&lt;SPAN&gt;For some data sets the final estimate of a parameter might equal one of its boundary constraints. This is usually not a cause for concern, but it might lead you to consider a different model. For instance, a variance component estimate can equal zero; in this case, you might want to drop the corresponding random effect from the model. However, be aware that changing the model in this fashion can affect degrees-of-freedom calculations.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If that doesn't seem to be the reason, then you'll want to post your code and an example dataset so that people here have more to work with.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:26:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>sld</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-17T00:26:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC MIXED with RANDOM fails to ESTIMATE Random Effect coefficients</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-with-RANDOM-fails-to-ESTIMATE-Random-Effect/m-p/341790#M17967</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Can anyone provide me with some insight on why the random statement has an estimate of 0?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have multiple data sets with the same issue (although the code runs just fine on others). The number of replicates ranges from 4 to 6 between the sets (most have 5) with 5 or more levels of treatment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running a proc mixed model and using the random statement to control for replicate (and also to see if there is an effect).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is the output I get for the random section:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Covariance Parameter Estimates &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Cov ParmEstimate &amp;nbsp; StandardError &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Z&amp;nbsp;Value &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; Pr &amp;gt; Z&lt;BR /&gt;rep &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 0 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; . &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Residual &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 0.000250 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;0.000072 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 3.460 &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;.0003&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any tips or tricks that would allow me to get an estimate in this section?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any advice would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2017 22:03:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-with-RANDOM-fails-to-ESTIMATE-Random-Effect/m-p/341790#M17967</guid>
      <dc:creator>ijhgo_uynrtpwiavnckml</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-16T22:03:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC MIXED with RANDOM fails to ESTIMATE Random Effect coefficients</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-with-RANDOM-fails-to-ESTIMATE-Random-Effect/m-p/341824#M17969</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is the MIXED procedure also telling you that the estimated G matrix is not positive definite?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Most likely, this result implies that there is little variation among &lt;EM&gt;rep&lt;/EM&gt;s for this response variable. The procedure has set the estimate to zero (hence, the SE is missing) and continued on its merry way. See Section III in this paper&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="Tips and Strategies for Mixed Modeling with SAS/STAT® Procedures " href="http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings12/332-2012.pdf" target="_self"&gt;http://support.sas.com/resources/papers/proceedings12/332-2012.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the documentation&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_mixed_sect028.htm" target="_self"&gt;https://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63033/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_mixed_sect028.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;under Parameter Constraints, you'll find:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"&lt;SPAN&gt;For some data sets the final estimate of a parameter might equal one of its boundary constraints. This is usually not a cause for concern, but it might lead you to consider a different model. For instance, a variance component estimate can equal zero; in this case, you might want to drop the corresponding random effect from the model. However, be aware that changing the model in this fashion can affect degrees-of-freedom calculations.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If that doesn't seem to be the reason, then you'll want to post your code and an example dataset so that people here have more to work with.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 00:26:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-with-RANDOM-fails-to-ESTIMATE-Random-Effect/m-p/341824#M17969</guid>
      <dc:creator>sld</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-17T00:26:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC MIXED with RANDOM fails to ESTIMATE Random Effect coefficients</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-with-RANDOM-fails-to-ESTIMATE-Random-Effect/m-p/341841#M17972</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;
If you could use PROC GLIMMIX , try :


random int time / type=chol 

&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 02:51:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-MIXED-with-RANDOM-fails-to-ESTIMATE-Random-Effect/m-p/341841#M17972</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-17T02:51:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

