<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: analyzing market research data in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40765#M1697</link>
    <description>sure, thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
here is the code I used (i'm sure its amateur) - the event refers to the event that the customer would be likely to consider company x. the data I have actually ranks that likelihood from 1 to 10 so I had to bucket it 1-5 vs. 6-10 which is useless, of course. I need another way to represent the data more fully. For my variables, "twentyfour" refers to the degree to which each respondent associates company x with that characteristic (the company has 24-hour service) - 1 being the weakest and 10 the strongest so, again, this method probably isn't best for that...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
rsubmit edwkdp;&lt;BR /&gt;
proc logistic data=kelly.mark1 outest=kelly.betas covout;&lt;BR /&gt;
CLASS twentyfour (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
CLASS lowerrate (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
CLASS service (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
class reliable (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
class time (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
class value (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
model likelihood2 (event='1') = twentyfour lowerrate service reliable time value &lt;BR /&gt;
/ selection=stepwise&lt;BR /&gt;
slentry = .05&lt;BR /&gt;
slstay =.02&lt;BR /&gt;
details&lt;BR /&gt;
lackfit;&lt;BR /&gt;
output out= kellypred p=phat lower=lcl upper=ucl&lt;BR /&gt;
predprob = (individual crossvalidate);&lt;BR /&gt;
run;&lt;BR /&gt;
endrsubmit;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
** I also ran a contigency table (creating dummy variables for each attribute and rating i.e. twentyfour1, twentyfour2, etc. and running them against likelihood1, likelihood2, etc) - I got contingency coefficients for that and those seem to be useful - but, I am open to other ideas. THANKS!!</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-06-04T13:26:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>analyzing market research data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40762#M1694</link>
      <description>I am trying to uncover the strength of the association between brand attributes and the likelihood a customer will consider purchasing a certain brand i.e. which attributes are really driving customer consideration.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
 I have a background in Applied Economics but have not worked with this type of data before, so I am unfamiliar with which method to use.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Data - My independent variables are 6 brand attributes - each respondent has rated them in order of the strength (1 to 10) to which they associate them with 4 different companies (i.e. if attribute A is strongly associated with company B, the datapoint is 10). The dependent variable is the likelihood that the customer would consider that company (1 to 10). We are trying to find a way to remove the company from the analysis and look only to make connections between brand attributes and likelihood of consideration.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I have tried a basic logistic model by lumping the dependent variable into two buckets (likely and not likely), but my dependent variable is not binary and this was useless. We don't necessarily need a regression coefficient but a correlation coefficient or something that can express the relationship (be it causal or not) between attributes and customer consideration.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:03:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40762#M1694</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-03T16:03:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: analyzing market research data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40763#M1695</link>
      <description>Hi Kelly Ups,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Could you please post the code you run to fit your logistic regression model?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 20:59:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40763#M1695</guid>
      <dc:creator>statsplank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-03T20:59:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: analyzing market research data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40764#M1696</link>
      <description>You could try a linear model (GLM).  If your dependent variable ranges from 1-10, it may have enough spread to allow normal distribution theory to work, especially if the sample size is reasonably large.  You can then use the company as a categorical variable and then you can interpret the other regression coefficients as partial correlation coefficients.  You might be able to use a MIXED model, as well.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You might also be able to do ordinal logistic regression, but you'll need a lot of data for that model to converge.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
You will need to do some reading (Paul Allison's BBUs are good) or get some help from a statistician involved in marketing to get all the pieces and interpretations together.  If you are near a major university with a business school, you might be able to get a grad student to help.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Doc Muhlbaier&lt;BR /&gt;
Duke</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 02:09:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40764#M1696</guid>
      <dc:creator>Doc_Duke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-04T02:09:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: analyzing market research data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40765#M1697</link>
      <description>sure, thanks&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
here is the code I used (i'm sure its amateur) - the event refers to the event that the customer would be likely to consider company x. the data I have actually ranks that likelihood from 1 to 10 so I had to bucket it 1-5 vs. 6-10 which is useless, of course. I need another way to represent the data more fully. For my variables, "twentyfour" refers to the degree to which each respondent associates company x with that characteristic (the company has 24-hour service) - 1 being the weakest and 10 the strongest so, again, this method probably isn't best for that...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
rsubmit edwkdp;&lt;BR /&gt;
proc logistic data=kelly.mark1 outest=kelly.betas covout;&lt;BR /&gt;
CLASS twentyfour (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
CLASS lowerrate (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
CLASS service (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
class reliable (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
class time (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
class value (ref= '1')/PARAM=ref;&lt;BR /&gt;
model likelihood2 (event='1') = twentyfour lowerrate service reliable time value &lt;BR /&gt;
/ selection=stepwise&lt;BR /&gt;
slentry = .05&lt;BR /&gt;
slstay =.02&lt;BR /&gt;
details&lt;BR /&gt;
lackfit;&lt;BR /&gt;
output out= kellypred p=phat lower=lcl upper=ucl&lt;BR /&gt;
predprob = (individual crossvalidate);&lt;BR /&gt;
run;&lt;BR /&gt;
endrsubmit;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
** I also ran a contigency table (creating dummy variables for each attribute and rating i.e. twentyfour1, twentyfour2, etc. and running them against likelihood1, likelihood2, etc) - I got contingency coefficients for that and those seem to be useful - but, I am open to other ideas. THANKS!!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 13:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40765#M1697</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-04T13:26:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: analyzing market research data</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40766#M1698</link>
      <description>If I wanted to use GLM or a mixed model - but my dependent variable was likelihood to consider company x (where values range from 1 to 10) and my independent variables were levels of association each respondent has with x number of product attributes (values range from 1 to 10) ... how would I construct this model to estimate partial effects of each attribute response to the likelihood to consider response. My variables are not discrete, so would I need to use odds ratio estimates and is that possible with GLM or mixed? I still haven't figured this one out, so thanks for any help you can give!</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:40:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/analyzing-market-research-data/m-p/40766#M1698</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-09T19:40:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

