<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Can you evaluate Linear contrasts if Model F is not sign.? in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Can-you-evaluate-Linear-contrasts-if-Model-F-is-not-sign/m-p/312820#M16493</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lamb BW. Model (p-values in parenthesis) is: BW = juniper (0.53)&amp;nbsp; day (0.02)&amp;nbsp; juniper x day (0.16).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Considering that juniper is not significant in the model, I don't think I can look at any linear/quadratic trends, correct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Basically, does the model variable have to be &amp;lt; 0.05 (or 0.1) to evaluate or discuss the linear/quad. trends?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:31:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AgReseach7</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-19T17:31:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Can you evaluate Linear contrasts if Model F is not sign.?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Can-you-evaluate-Linear-contrasts-if-Model-F-is-not-sign/m-p/312820#M16493</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Lamb BW. Model (p-values in parenthesis) is: BW = juniper (0.53)&amp;nbsp; day (0.02)&amp;nbsp; juniper x day (0.16).&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Considering that juniper is not significant in the model, I don't think I can look at any linear/quadratic trends, correct?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Basically, does the model variable have to be &amp;lt; 0.05 (or 0.1) to evaluate or discuss the linear/quad. trends?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 17:31:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Can-you-evaluate-Linear-contrasts-if-Model-F-is-not-sign/m-p/312820#M16493</guid>
      <dc:creator>AgReseach7</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-19T17:31:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Can you evaluate Linear contrasts if Model F is not sign.?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Can-you-evaluate-Linear-contrasts-if-Model-F-is-not-sign/m-p/315921#M16642</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not necessarily. &amp;nbsp;The omnibus F test is essentially whether at least one mean is different. &amp;nbsp;Trend testing is a specific contrast that involves all of the means--I have seen several examples where a trend test is significant while the omnibus F is not. &amp;nbsp;The single degree of freedom trend test is more powerful because of the assumption of linearity (or quadratic-ness). &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is a different situation than the comparison of two means following the omnibus test, where you already have information that no two means are likely to be different.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 12:59:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Can-you-evaluate-Linear-contrasts-if-Model-F-is-not-sign/m-p/315921#M16642</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-01T12:59:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

