<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC PHREG (Fine and Gray model) in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/312526#M16486</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have checked the dftimes, and found that only 61&amp;nbsp;pairs of observation have tied event times.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 06:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alddle</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-18T06:40:38Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC PHREG (Fine and Gray model)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/312506#M16483</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I used &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#993300"&gt;proc phreg&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; to run &lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color="#993300"&gt;fine and gray&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; model. My dataset has no missing value, and when the univeriate analysis was taken, everything is OK (the number of used observations = the number of read&amp;nbsp;observations). But when the multivariate model was analized, things would be like this, the log as below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;ods graphics on;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;proc phreg data=model_os_m plots(overlay=stratum)=cif;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;class A&amp;nbsp;(ref='Normal');&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;class B(order=internal ref=first) C(order=internal ref=first);&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;model dftime*status(0)=A&amp;nbsp;B&amp;nbsp;C&amp;nbsp;D / eventcode=1;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;Hazardratio 'Pairwise' A&amp;nbsp;/ diff=pairwise;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;baseline covariates=cov_os2_m out=outos2m cif=_all_;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;run;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#800000"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;NOTE: 331 observations were deleted due either to missing or invalid values for the time,&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#800000"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;censoring, frequency or explanatory variables or to invalid operations in generating the&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#800000"&gt;&lt;U&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;values for some of the explanatory variables.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/U&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;NOTE: Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have tried proc &lt;FONT color="#993300"&gt;print/frequency&lt;/FONT&gt; in the Fine and gray model, but the log states that&amp;nbsp;&lt;FONT color="#993300"&gt;&lt;FONT color="#3366FF"&gt;NOTE:&lt;/FONT&gt; The RESMART= option (OUTPUT statement) is ignored for the Fine and Gray competing-risks analysis.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#339966"&gt;So, why 331 observations have been deleted in the multivariate analysis? And how can I identify which observations have not been used in the final model? Could you please tell me how can I solve this problem in fine and gray model test?&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alddle&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 03:07:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/312506#M16483</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alddle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T03:07:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC PHREG (Fine and Gray model)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/312522#M16484</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It does say invalid values. Do all your times make sense?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 05:43:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/312522#M16484</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T05:43:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC PHREG (Fine and Gray model)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/312525#M16485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Reeza,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks. Do you mean tied event times? Or you mean the robust covariance matrix? But, why univeriate analysis of each factor for fine and fray model is OK? Could you please tell me how can I find these invalid times?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alddle&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 06:20:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/312525#M16485</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alddle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T06:20:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC PHREG (Fine and Gray model)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/312526#M16486</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have checked the dftimes, and found that only 61&amp;nbsp;pairs of observation have tied event times.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 06:40:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/312526#M16486</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alddle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T06:40:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC PHREG (Fine and Gray model)</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/313767#M16527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks. Some observations have been deleted due to a irrelevant variable with missing data uncorrectly involved in the "class" statement.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:14:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-PHREG-Fine-and-Gray-model/m-p/313767#M16527</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alddle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-23T13:14:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

