<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Wald Chi Square in proc surveyfreq p-value in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Wald-Chi-Square-in-proc-surveyfreq-p-value/m-p/312508#M16465</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If I am running a Weld Chi Square test along with a proc surveyfreq, that is:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;proc surveyfreq data=malaria_data;&lt;BR /&gt;tables treatment*religion / wchisq;&lt;BR /&gt;cluster village;&lt;BR /&gt;weight weight;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is the Pr&amp;gt;F the same as the p-value in that if Pr&amp;gt;F is greater than 0.05 (alpha value), we can accept the null hypothesis that the two variables are indepedent, leading us to believe that randomization into a treatment group has worked in regards to the characteristic of religion?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>amajeau</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-11-18T08:03:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Wald Chi Square in proc surveyfreq p-value</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Wald-Chi-Square-in-proc-surveyfreq-p-value/m-p/312508#M16465</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If I am running a Weld Chi Square test along with a proc surveyfreq, that is:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;proc surveyfreq data=malaria_data;&lt;BR /&gt;tables treatment*religion / wchisq;&lt;BR /&gt;cluster village;&lt;BR /&gt;weight weight;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Is the Pr&amp;gt;F the same as the p-value in that if Pr&amp;gt;F is greater than 0.05 (alpha value), we can accept the null hypothesis that the two variables are indepedent, leading us to believe that randomization into a treatment group has worked in regards to the characteristic of religion?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:03:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Wald-Chi-Square-in-proc-surveyfreq-p-value/m-p/312508#M16465</guid>
      <dc:creator>amajeau</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T08:03:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Wald Chi Square in proc surveyfreq p-value</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Wald-Chi-Square-in-proc-surveyfreq-p-value/m-p/312582#M16475</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Yes. In SAS procedures the output column for the p-values will be labeled as "Pr &amp;gt; &lt;EM&gt;statistic&lt;/EM&gt;" where &lt;EM&gt;statistic &lt;/EM&gt;might be "t" for a t-statistic, "F" &amp;nbsp;for an F statistic, "ChiSq" for a chi-square statistic, and so on.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Small values in that column indicate a &amp;nbsp;rejection of the null hypothesis at the specified significance level.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 11:01:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Wald-Chi-Square-in-proc-surveyfreq-p-value/m-p/312582#M16475</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-11-18T11:01:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

