<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Number of observations for logistic regression in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296862#M15819</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This implies that your study was under powered, you didn't have enough samples to find a significant difference - based on the observed difference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 23:49:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-09-06T23:49:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Number of observations for logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296843#M15816</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm new SAS user;&amp;nbsp;I performed a logistic regression of 68 observations, but this is not significant. A friend advised me to take two or three times the number of observations that I have is to say the same thing but in two or three times. When I do this, then the regression is significant. But have I the right to do so?&lt;BR /&gt;If not, what can I do? I think this is my échatillon of studies was small.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 21:35:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296843#M15816</guid>
      <dc:creator>freedom93</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-06T21:35:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Number of observations for logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296848#M15817</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Don't do that. One of the key assumptions for inference in logistic regression is the independence of observations. Duplicated obs are definitely not independent.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What you can do:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;UL&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Plot the data. Make sure there are no outliers.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Consider using another statistical model.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;LI&gt;Get more independent data.&lt;/LI&gt;
&lt;/UL&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Good luck.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 22:21:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296848#M15817</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-06T22:21:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Number of observations for logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296853#M15818</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;How many independent variables are you using? How many levels are there for each of those? Too many varaibles/levels will often leave nothing signficant as there are not enough observations in any group.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Also, models are NOT required to have a signficant difference. The fact that there isn't may well mean that there is not sufficient influence on the population&amp;nbsp;from your variables.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 22:47:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296853#M15818</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-06T22:47:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Number of observations for logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296862#M15819</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This implies that your study was under powered, you didn't have enough samples to find a significant difference - based on the observed difference.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2016 23:49:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296862#M15819</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-06T23:49:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Number of observations for logistic regression</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296876#M15820</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have small sample data. Try EXACT logistic regression.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2016 01:55:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Number-of-observations-for-logistic-regression/m-p/296876#M15820</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-07T01:55:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

