<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Stopping rule for chi-squared discretization algorithm in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stopping-rule-for-chi-squared-discretization-algorithm/m-p/37224#M1565</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I should begin by admitting that I am not a statistician and am not familiar with either the method you are using or with IML.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, when I have confronted situations where I needed to incorporate a somewhat intelligent stopping point, I found it useful to apply a rather brute force approach, namely to wrap the code within a macro that uses a binary decision tree to test various criteria until an acceptible limit is reached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, if you are asking what such a criterion might be, please just ignore this post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:04:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>art297</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-10-28T15:04:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Stopping rule for chi-squared discretization algorithm</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stopping-rule-for-chi-squared-discretization-algorithm/m-p/37223#M1564</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I developed an algorithm that uses the chi-squared test to perform supervised discretization of a continuous variable. I described it in the paper "ChiD-A Chi-Squared Discretization Algorithm" published in the WUSS 2011 Proceedings available at &lt;A href="http://www.wuss.org/proceedings11/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.wuss.org/proceedings11/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The stopping criterion is not very intelligent, and I would like to know if there are better ways of stopping the discretization process.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 14:41:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stopping-rule-for-chi-squared-discretization-algorithm/m-p/37223#M1564</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tenno1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T14:41:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stopping rule for chi-squared discretization algorithm</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stopping-rule-for-chi-squared-discretization-algorithm/m-p/37224#M1565</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I should begin by admitting that I am not a statistician and am not familiar with either the method you are using or with IML.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That said, when I have confronted situations where I needed to incorporate a somewhat intelligent stopping point, I found it useful to apply a rather brute force approach, namely to wrap the code within a macro that uses a binary decision tree to test various criteria until an acceptible limit is reached.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Of course, if you are asking what such a criterion might be, please just ignore this post.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:04:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stopping-rule-for-chi-squared-discretization-algorithm/m-p/37224#M1565</guid>
      <dc:creator>art297</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T15:04:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Stopping rule for chi-squared discretization algorithm</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stopping-rule-for-chi-squared-discretization-algorithm/m-p/37225#M1566</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Probably a good general approach. In IML you don't even need to use a macro. In IML you can just wrap the code in a module definition and call the module at each step of an iterative method. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For example, if you're trying to find a zero, see &lt;A href="http://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2011/08/03/finding-the-root-of-a-univariate-function/"&gt;http://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2011/08/03/finding-the-root-of-a-univariate-function/&lt;/A&gt; Or, if you're trying to optimize some criterion, see &lt;A href="http://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2011/10/12/maximum-likelihood-estimation-in-sasiml/"&gt;http://blogs.sas.com/content/iml/2011/10/12/maximum-likelihood-estimation-in-sasiml/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 15:22:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Stopping-rule-for-chi-squared-discretization-algorithm/m-p/37225#M1566</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-10-28T15:22:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

