<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Linear model after Conjoint Analysis in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Linear-model-after-Conjoint-Analysis/m-p/293099#M15587</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running a conjoint analysis with, let's say 2 attributes with each 2 levels:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att1: Color&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att1Lv1: Red&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att1Lv2: Blue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att2: Size&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att2Lv1: small&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att2Lv2: large&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Putting this in a linear model, this should look like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Choice"=beta0 + beta1*red+beta2*blue+beta3*small+beta4*large&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please correct me if I'm wrong.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now if I want to analyse this through e.g. PROC MODEL I would put all of the levels after PROC MODEL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then SAS would show me part-worths for red, blue and small but not for large. I understand that this is chosen as the "base product" so the part worth of small is the utility compared to "large".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, how can I also display the part-worth of "large"? Is this even possibile?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using SAS Enterprise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ahoeweler</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-22T10:47:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Linear model after Conjoint Analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Linear-model-after-Conjoint-Analysis/m-p/293099#M15587</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am running a conjoint analysis with, let's say 2 attributes with each 2 levels:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att1: Color&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att1Lv1: Red&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att1Lv2: Blue&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att2: Size&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att2Lv1: small&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Att2Lv2: large&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Putting this in a linear model, this should look like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;"Choice"=beta0 + beta1*red+beta2*blue+beta3*small+beta4*large&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please correct me if I'm wrong.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now if I want to analyse this through e.g. PROC MODEL I would put all of the levels after PROC MODEL.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then SAS would show me part-worths for red, blue and small but not for large. I understand that this is chosen as the "base product" so the part worth of small is the utility compared to "large".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, how can I also display the part-worth of "large"? Is this even possibile?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am using SAS Enterprise.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:47:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Linear-model-after-Conjoint-Analysis/m-p/293099#M15587</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahoeweler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-22T10:47:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linear model after Conjoint Analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Linear-model-after-Conjoint-Analysis/m-p/293128#M15589</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I recommend that you look at the paper &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/mr2010h.pdf" target="_self"&gt;"Conjoint Analysis" by Warren Kuhfeld&lt;/A&gt;. The example on p. 687 ("Chocolate candy") is essentially the same as the problem you describe. It uses PROC TRANSREG to analyze the data. &lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/68162/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_transreg_examples05.htm" target="_self"&gt;The documentation for PROC TRANSREG contains additional examples.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2016 13:04:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Linear-model-after-Conjoint-Analysis/m-p/293128#M15589</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-22T13:04:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Linear model after Conjoint Analysis</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Linear-model-after-Conjoint-Analysis/m-p/299552#M15930</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Rick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you very much for your answer. The example you mentioned in Kuhfeld (2010) however deals with a rating based conjoint analysis. I am conducting a choice based conjoint analysis. Is this still comparable then?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Update:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I run a conditional logit model, for example with proc mdc I get part-worths for the attribute levels red, blue and small. "Large" is set to 0 which makes sense to me but I wonder how I can set "blue" to zero, as well to make comparisons possible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your help.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Alex&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:36:56 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Linear-model-after-Conjoint-Analysis/m-p/299552#M15930</guid>
      <dc:creator>ahoeweler</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-20T14:36:56Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

