<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Logistic regression concordant percentage in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Logistic-regression-concordant-percentage/m-p/292832#M15572</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Only if your data has perfect separation. Usually this happens when you accidentally include a variable that's observed with the outcome, sometimes after the fact.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't trust the model and would be verifying it thoroughly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PS I'm going to move this to the stats forums as it relates more to statistics.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-19T19:53:20Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Logistic regression concordant percentage</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Logistic-regression-concordant-percentage/m-p/292809#M15571</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm sas new user. I wonder if it's possible to get a 100% concordant percentage and D de Somers value=1 with a logistic regression. It seems so perfect to me!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 18:45:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Logistic-regression-concordant-percentage/m-p/292809#M15571</guid>
      <dc:creator>freedom93</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-19T18:45:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Logistic regression concordant percentage</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Logistic-regression-concordant-percentage/m-p/292832#M15572</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Only if your data has perfect separation. Usually this happens when you accidentally include a variable that's observed with the outcome, sometimes after the fact.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I wouldn't trust the model and would be verifying it thoroughly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;PS I'm going to move this to the stats forums as it relates more to statistics.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2016 19:53:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Logistic-regression-concordant-percentage/m-p/292832#M15572</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-19T19:53:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

