<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Why there is not report of Gamma value to indicate the association in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290901#M15465</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Great thanks, got now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 07:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Jack2012</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-11T07:41:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why there is not report of Gamma value to indicate the association</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290678#M15450</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG title="Question.jpg" alt="Question.jpg" src="https://communities.sas.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/4504i587531A08D4200AC/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dear All,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am using PROC FREQ to get the proportion of discordant pairs and its 90% Confidence interval. However, I found one special case when the Binary response all equal to 1, then there is no report on the ODDS ratio, Gamma, etc.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anybody can help me to figure out this? To my understanding, if all binary Response equal to 1, then the Gamma value should be 1.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many thanks for your help to me on this.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc freq data=dar_s order=data;  
	tables drgdsc1a* SWAEVL2C/measures CL;
run;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 11:59:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290678#M15450</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jack2012</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-10T11:59:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why there is not report of Gamma value to indicate the association</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290683#M15451</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Check the log. Is there a NOTE that says:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;NOTE: No statistics are computed for drgdsla * &amp;nbsp;SWAEVL2C&amp;nbsp;because &lt;SPAN&gt;S&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;WAEVL2C&lt;/SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;has less than 2 nonmissing levels.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:18:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290683#M15451</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-10T12:18:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why there is not report of Gamma value to indicate the association</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290693#M15452</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;These measures of association are defined for ordinal variables in two-way tables.&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/procstat/68142/HTML/default/viewer.htm#procstat_freq_details22.htm" target="_self"&gt; From the doc&lt;/A&gt;: "A pair is concordant if the observation with the larger value of X also has the larger value of Y." &amp;nbsp;(X=row variable; Y=column variable)&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In your example, the Y variable has only one value. There is no "larger value of Y" to use to define pairs as condordant or discordant. Thus any formula that uses "number of condordant pairs" is undefined.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2016 12:35:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290693#M15452</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-10T12:35:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why there is not report of Gamma value to indicate the association</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290884#M15462</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear Rick,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You ansswered my question perfectly. I understand the "concordant and discordant" more clearly with you post.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Best,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Jack&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 07:40:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290884#M15462</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jack2012</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-11T07:40:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why there is not report of Gamma value to indicate the association</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290889#M15463</link>
      <description>&lt;PRE&gt;

As Rick pointed out, you can't get Gamma due to there is only one level(value 1) of SWAVEL2C.
Gamma measure the correlation between row variable and col variable, so you can't get it if col variable only have one level.

&lt;/PRE&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 06:46:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290889#M15463</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-11T06:46:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why there is not report of Gamma value to indicate the association</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290901#M15465</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Great thanks, got now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2016 07:41:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Why-there-is-not-report-of-Gamma-value-to-indicate-the/m-p/290901#M15465</guid>
      <dc:creator>Jack2012</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-11T07:41:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

