<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: two-part models in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/two-part-models/m-p/290117#M15392</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I think I would stick with the ZIP model. You can use GENMOD or PROC FMM. The model will predict the probability of a zero count, which is P(Y=p | x). The client wants "one minus that predicted probability": 1 - P(Y=0| x)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 09:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-08-08T09:49:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>two-part models</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/two-part-models/m-p/290059#M15389</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The logit model part of a ZIP model models the extra zeros as the outcome, but my client wants the probability of a count greater than 0 instead. &amp;nbsp;Is it appropriate to do 2 completely separate models - a proc logistic modeling count&amp;gt;0 and a proc genmod with the zeros excluded modeling the count part?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 01:54:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/two-part-models/m-p/290059#M15389</guid>
      <dc:creator>proctice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-08T01:54:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: two-part models</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/two-part-models/m-p/290117#M15392</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think I would stick with the ZIP model. You can use GENMOD or PROC FMM. The model will predict the probability of a zero count, which is P(Y=p | x). The client wants "one minus that predicted probability": 1 - P(Y=0| x)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 09:49:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/two-part-models/m-p/290117#M15392</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-08T09:49:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: two-part models</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/two-part-models/m-p/290224#M15399</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;They are more interested in the odds ratios being in&amp;nbsp;the right direction, can I just invert them?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:45:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/two-part-models/m-p/290224#M15399</guid>
      <dc:creator>proctice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-08T15:45:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: two-part models</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/two-part-models/m-p/290226#M15400</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can invert odds ratios by using the EVENT= option on the response variable on the MODEL statement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Instead of&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;model y(event="0") = x1 x2 x3;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;you can invert the odds ratio&amp;nbsp;by using&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;model y(event="1") = x1 x2 x3;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 15:52:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/two-part-models/m-p/290226#M15400</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-08-08T15:52:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

