<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC - SAS 9.3 vs. SAS 9.4 in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-SURVEYLOGISTIC-SAS-9-3-vs-SAS-9-4/m-p/288427#M15301</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I would contact SAS Support with this, if you have concerns. It also depends on the differences, if their less than 0.0001 it's most likely precision issues more than anything else.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:23:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-31T23:23:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC - SAS 9.3 vs. SAS 9.4</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-SURVEYLOGISTIC-SAS-9-3-vs-SAS-9-4/m-p/288033#M15281</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi everyone,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I wonder why the confidence intervals (variance estimates) are slightly different when I run the exact same proc surveylogistic syntax&amp;nbsp;using SAS 9.4 and SAS 9.3. &amp;nbsp;For example:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc surveylogistic data= abc&amp;nbsp;varmethod= BRR;&lt;BR /&gt;weight WGT_FULL;&lt;BR /&gt;repweights bsw1-bsw500 / df =24;&lt;BR /&gt;class sex&amp;nbsp;(ref= '1') / param = ref;&lt;BR /&gt;model SLP=sex;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The confidence intervals are slightly wider when I used&amp;nbsp;SAS 9.4. &amp;nbsp;Are there any differences between the two versions for this procedure?? I can't seem to find the information anywhere else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 04:04:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-SURVEYLOGISTIC-SAS-9-3-vs-SAS-9-4/m-p/288033#M15281</guid>
      <dc:creator>kiwiepi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-29T04:04:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC - SAS 9.3 vs. SAS 9.4</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-SURVEYLOGISTIC-SAS-9-3-vs-SAS-9-4/m-p/288128#M15286</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The most likely reason would be the refinement of algorithms in the coding of procedures between releases.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Secondary posibilities are a change from a 32-bit to 64-bit implementation.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 14:28:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-SURVEYLOGISTIC-SAS-9-3-vs-SAS-9-4/m-p/288128#M15286</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-29T14:28:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC SURVEYLOGISTIC - SAS 9.3 vs. SAS 9.4</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-SURVEYLOGISTIC-SAS-9-3-vs-SAS-9-4/m-p/288427#M15301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I would contact SAS Support with this, if you have concerns. It also depends on the differences, if their less than 0.0001 it's most likely precision issues more than anything else.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2016 23:23:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-SURVEYLOGISTIC-SAS-9-3-vs-SAS-9-4/m-p/288427#M15301</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-31T23:23:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

