<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Proc Mixed Command- WARNING: Stopped because of infinite likelihood in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Command-WARNING-Stopped-because-of-infinite/m-p/283567#M14947</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Just guessing here, but because extraversionnew and sample are both crossed with time, it may be that you have something like complete collinearity between some of the variables in your model. &amp;nbsp;The other possibility is that you are overfitting your available data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-07-11T18:07:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc Mixed Command- WARNING: Stopped because of infinite likelihood</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Command-WARNING-Stopped-because-of-infinite/m-p/283184#M14922</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m looking at intra-individual variability for three variables (rate life in the past, present and the future) using the Proc Mixed command in SAS.&amp;nbsp;My&amp;nbsp;main predictors are Sample( nationality:Japan vs. U.S.),&amp;nbsp;5 Age groups and&amp;nbsp;three&amp;nbsp;time points (past, present and&amp;nbsp;future). One of my level 2 variables(extraversion personality trait, which I am adjusting as a covariate) correlates very differently with the three main variables. My model only works when I also include this level 2 variable (Extraversion) in the random statement. I know we only put level 1 variables (slopes) in the random statements and not level 2 variables so I am not sure why the model only works when I put the level 2 variable in the random statement.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE&gt;&lt;CODE class=" language-sas"&gt;proc mixed noclprint covtest ; 
	class sample AgeGroup5 time marriedyn gender ; 
	model ratelife =  gender NewChronNumb marriedyn extraversionnew|time NeuroticismNew ZEduHighest sample|time|AgeGroup5 
	/solution ddfm=bw;
	random intercept extraversionnew  / type=un subject=id;
	lsmeans sample*time*agegroup5;
	run; &lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your help in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Joanna&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2016 23:56:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Command-WARNING-Stopped-because-of-infinite/m-p/283184#M14922</guid>
      <dc:creator>joannahh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-09T23:56:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc Mixed Command- WARNING: Stopped because of infinite likelihood</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Command-WARNING-Stopped-because-of-infinite/m-p/283567#M14947</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just guessing here, but because extraversionnew and sample are both crossed with time, it may be that you have something like complete collinearity between some of the variables in your model. &amp;nbsp;The other possibility is that you are overfitting your available data.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 18:07:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-Mixed-Command-WARNING-Stopped-because-of-infinite/m-p/283567#M14947</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-07-11T18:07:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

