<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Interpreting PROC Mixed Influence Diagnostics in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpreting-PROC-Mixed-Influence-Diagnostics/m-p/276947#M14635</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In addition to the examples in the MIXED chapter of the User's Guide (available on-line), I recommend that you read the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi29/189-29.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi29/189-29.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:29:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>lvm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-06-13T14:29:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Interpreting PROC Mixed Influence Diagnostics</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpreting-PROC-Mixed-Influence-Diagnostics/m-p/276500#M14614</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm a business user focused on interpretation of results (so I can muck around with somebody else's code and have enough of a statistical background to be dangerous). &amp;nbsp;I am looking for help in interpretting the outputs of PROC MIXED Influence Diagnostics. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. &amp;nbsp;My approach initially is to look at Cook's D and use a cutoff of 4/n, DFFITS with a cutoff of 2SQRT(p/n) &amp;nbsp;and examine if RMSE changes much for levels with or without this level. &amp;nbsp;is that a valid approach?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. &amp;nbsp;I read breifly somewhere that I could use PRESS to examine overfitting - does anybody have any direction they coud provide on how I should thinkg aobut this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3. &amp;nbsp;How should I interpret the other measures provided?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4. &amp;nbsp;I have a model that provides no diagnostics, providing notes only of Loss of Rank or Change in Singularity. &amp;nbsp;Need help in interpetting this (but I fear this means that my model is fragile and cannot live without all the levels that I'm using. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;5. &amp;nbsp;Anything that I'm missing / not thinking of?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Help greatly appreciated&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpreting-PROC-Mixed-Influence-Diagnostics/m-p/276500#M14614</guid>
      <dc:creator>Redleg</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-10T13:48:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Interpreting PROC Mixed Influence Diagnostics</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpreting-PROC-Mixed-Influence-Diagnostics/m-p/276947#M14635</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In addition to the examples in the MIXED chapter of the User's Guide (available on-line), I recommend that you read the following:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi29/189-29.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi29/189-29.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2016 14:29:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Interpreting-PROC-Mixed-Influence-Diagnostics/m-p/276947#M14635</guid>
      <dc:creator>lvm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-06-13T14:29:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

