<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Within run variability using proc mixed in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Within-run-variability-using-proc-mixed/m-p/33252#M1362</link>
    <description>I always get great ideas when I post here and hence the question.&lt;BR /&gt;
I ran the following model:&lt;BR /&gt;
proc mixed ;&lt;BR /&gt;
class lot operator instrument run tube sample day;&lt;BR /&gt;
model response= ;&lt;BR /&gt;
random  sample day lot tube operator instrument run;&lt;BR /&gt;
run;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Now, I have been asked to include within-run and between-run variability in the table(where I represented all the variance estimates as a % of the total). Any thoughts? I tried a few things but not quite there yet.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SAS_User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-12T23:22:22Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Within run variability using proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Within-run-variability-using-proc-mixed/m-p/33252#M1362</link>
      <description>I always get great ideas when I post here and hence the question.&lt;BR /&gt;
I ran the following model:&lt;BR /&gt;
proc mixed ;&lt;BR /&gt;
class lot operator instrument run tube sample day;&lt;BR /&gt;
model response= ;&lt;BR /&gt;
random  sample day lot tube operator instrument run;&lt;BR /&gt;
run;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Now, I have been asked to include within-run and between-run variability in the table(where I represented all the variance estimates as a % of the total). Any thoughts? I tried a few things but not quite there yet.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:22:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Within-run-variability-using-proc-mixed/m-p/33252#M1362</guid>
      <dc:creator>SAS_User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-12T23:22:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Within run variability using proc mixed</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Within-run-variability-using-proc-mixed/m-p/33253#M1363</link>
      <description>I am skeptical about your model. The model should depend on your experimental (or survey) design (layout). Just based on the variable names, I suspect that some effects should be nested within others.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 14:43:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Within-run-variability-using-proc-mixed/m-p/33253#M1363</guid>
      <dc:creator>lvm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-19T14:43:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

