<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Best Fit Logistic Regression Model in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251849#M13284</link>
    <description>I think stepwise selection has better chance to give the model with the best fit (compared to forward / backward) . This is because this method can both go forward and backward until the model can not end up with a better fit. Backward selection goes only backward and forward go only forward. &lt;BR /&gt;Btw, there is also the LASSO method, which can be as good as stepwise selection.</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:15:57 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JacobSimonsen</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-23T20:15:57Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Best Fit Logistic Regression Model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251814#M13279</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello all!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need to fit a logistic regression model and am wondering&amp;nbsp;which model-seletion method would be best. I have been advised to stay away from forward/backward/stepwise regression. All-possible-regression seems attractive, but I must admit I'm a little lost on AIC/BIC/Cp/etc and exactly&amp;nbsp;&lt;EM&gt;how&lt;/EM&gt; I would go about picking the best model...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a binary response variable, a categorical predictor, 10 categorical covariates, and 2 continuous covariates.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you in advance!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251814#M13279</guid>
      <dc:creator>chelsealutz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-23T17:26:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Fit Logistic Regression Model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251816#M13280</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Search Model Selection Method on here...this topic comes up frequently, and there is no 'CORRECT' answer, but some answers are more valid than others &lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":winking_face:"&gt;😉&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 17:27:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251816#M13280</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-23T17:27:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Fit Logistic Regression Model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251849#M13284</link>
      <description>I think stepwise selection has better chance to give the model with the best fit (compared to forward / backward) . This is because this method can both go forward and backward until the model can not end up with a better fit. Backward selection goes only backward and forward go only forward. &lt;BR /&gt;Btw, there is also the LASSO method, which can be as good as stepwise selection.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:15:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251849#M13284</guid>
      <dc:creator>JacobSimonsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-23T20:15:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Fit Logistic Regression Model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251943#M13296</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Unfortunately I've been all over the boards and haven't found anything useful. I've also read several papers - I just can't seem to locate the syntax for an all-possible. In addition, I was hoping someone could break it down for me in less technical language so I could really understand AIC/Cp/etc...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 02:12:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251943#M13296</guid>
      <dc:creator>chelsealutz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-24T02:12:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Fit Logistic Regression Model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251948#M13297</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You gotta know&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt; forward/backward/stepwise regression all these are doing unconditional logistic regression.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After getting the most influent variables , to get Best Fit , you'd better try Exact logistic&amp;nbsp;regression or Conditional&amp;nbsp; logistic&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;regression or Penalty&amp;nbsp; logistic&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN&gt;regression(add FIRTH option into ( MODEL statement ) .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 03:11:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/251948#M13297</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-24T03:11:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Best Fit Logistic Regression Model</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/252113#M13309</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://communities.sas.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/68094"&gt;@chelsealutz﻿&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After finding the potential factor/variable &amp;nbsp;for inclusion in the model using any of:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- selection = stepwise slentry = 0.15 slstay = 0.15;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- selection &lt;/SPAN&gt;= forward &amp;nbsp;slentry =0.15&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- selection &lt;/SPAN&gt;= backward slstay = 0.15&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;- selection &lt;/SPAN&gt;= score ,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;for both quantitative and categorical&amp;nbsp;variables and interaction term - you can&amp;nbsp;c&lt;SPAN&gt;ompare&amp;nbsp;models based on following criteria:&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;-2LogL&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The value itself is not important. It is used to compare two nested models, model with smaller -2LogL is better. Difference in -2LogL between two nested models is approximately distributed as Chi-square.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;AIC (Akaike Information Criterion)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;AIC is used to compare non-nested models on the same sample. &lt;STRONG&gt;AIC&lt;/STRONG&gt; value itself is not meaningful but the model with the smallest &lt;STRONG&gt;AIC&lt;/STRONG&gt; is considered the best.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;SC (S&lt;/STRONG&gt;chwarz Criterion)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Model with smallest &lt;STRONG&gt;SC&lt;/STRONG&gt; is most desirable but the value itself is not meaningful. Like AIC, it is appropriate for non-nested models.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;ROC Area&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;The area under the ROC curve is a measure of the model’s ability to discriminate between event and non-event:&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Large values are desirable (predictive accuracy for (event, non-event) pairs).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ROC = 0.5: no discrimination (no better than coin toss)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;0.7 &amp;lt;= ROC &amp;lt; 0.8: acceptable discrimination&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;0.8 &amp;lt;= ROC &amp;lt; 0.9: excellent discrimination&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;ROC &amp;gt; 0.9: outstanding discrimination&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Brier’s Score&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Small values are desirable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 18:04:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Best-Fit-Logistic-Regression-Model/m-p/252113#M13309</guid>
      <dc:creator>samnan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-24T18:04:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

