<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Adjusted R square in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjusted-R-square/m-p/249942#M13145</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Adj R2=1- (1-r2)(N-1)/N-p-1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where N=total sample size&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; p=no of predictors&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;r-coeff of determination&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;If i get a negative adj r2 then what can i conclude from that??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 06:02:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>pawandh</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-02-14T06:02:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Adjusted R square</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjusted-R-square/m-p/249942#M13145</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Adj R2=1- (1-r2)(N-1)/N-p-1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;where N=total sample size&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; p=no of predictors&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;r-coeff of determination&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;If i get a negative adj r2 then what can i conclude from that??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 06:02:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjusted-R-square/m-p/249942#M13145</guid>
      <dc:creator>pawandh</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-14T06:02:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adjusted R square</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjusted-R-square/m-p/249949#M13151</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The predicted R-squared helps you find out how well&amp;nbsp;the model fits the original data. Generally, if this is low (approaching zero, or negative), then your model is not very good.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Adjusted" R-squared lets you compare regression models with different numbers of predictors.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, to answer your question, your model is not very good and you should try another.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Norman.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:04:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjusted-R-square/m-p/249949#M13151</guid>
      <dc:creator>Norman21</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-14T10:04:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Adjusted R square</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjusted-R-square/m-p/250001#M13162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It is possible. It usually means that you have many explanatory effects compared to the number of observations. I can't remember the rule-of-thumb right now, but some experts recommend a minimum of&amp;nbsp;10-20 observations per regressor.&amp;nbsp; If you have only&amp;nbsp;100 observations and you try to use 75-100 effects, your model will be bad and you might get a negative adjusted R-squared value.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Limit yourself to main effects instead of many interactions, or choose fewer explanatory variables.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2016 20:26:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Adjusted-R-square/m-p/250001#M13162</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-02-14T20:26:24Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

