<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: TTest with small unequal sample size in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/TTest-with-small-unequal-sample-size/m-p/239640#M12686</link>
    <description>Besides non-parametric, I would also be relying heavily on knowledge of the data and make sure to include confidence intervals.</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-16T22:35:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TTest with small unequal sample size</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/TTest-with-small-unequal-sample-size/m-p/239626#M12684</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to compare means of two groups. &amp;nbsp;The sample size for each group is small (between 9 and 15) and the sample size for each group is not the same. &amp;nbsp;I have been using proc ttest and looking at the satterthwaite correction p value. The variances are equal (normality is a little off), but I read somewhere that satterthwaite corrects for both variance issues as well as unequal sample sizes.&amp;nbsp;I have also been using proc npar1way and looking at the Wilcoxon results, which I think weights by sample size as the default. &amp;nbsp;Am I on the right track? &amp;nbsp;Any advice is appreciated. &amp;nbsp;Thanks.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:27:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/TTest-with-small-unequal-sample-size/m-p/239626#M12684</guid>
      <dc:creator>nodak</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-16T21:27:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TTest with small unequal sample size</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/TTest-with-small-unequal-sample-size/m-p/239634#M12685</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;With samples that small I personally would lean heavily on the nonparametric approaches.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:28:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/TTest-with-small-unequal-sample-size/m-p/239634#M12685</guid>
      <dc:creator>ballardw</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-16T22:28:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: TTest with small unequal sample size</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/TTest-with-small-unequal-sample-size/m-p/239640#M12686</link>
      <description>Besides non-parametric, I would also be relying heavily on knowledge of the data and make sure to include confidence intervals.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:35:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/TTest-with-small-unequal-sample-size/m-p/239640#M12686</guid>
      <dc:creator>Reeza</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-16T22:35:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

