<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Making two groups alike for test/control comparisons in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Making-two-groups-alike-for-test-control-comparisons/m-p/234244#M12367</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I work in the marketing analytics team of a bank and we work mainly on test/control testing. The test is the target population which was sent offers/campaigns and the control is left untreated. My team analyzes the difference in behavior between these two groups to gauge campaign performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Before we move into comparison, we ensure that the test and control are "like-to-like." This means that the test and control are similar in terms of a variable that is thought to be significant. For example, for a campaign that is aimed at improving checking-account balances of customers, we ensure that the test and control have equal mean &lt;SPAN&gt;checking-account &lt;/SPAN&gt;balance i.e. they are "like-to-like." We have an iterative procedure that helps us do this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(1) Run proc ttest on the test/control data with the &lt;SPAN&gt;checking-account &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;balance as the "var" variable and "TEST/CONTROL" as the "class" variable&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(2) If p-value is not greater than&amp;nbsp;0.98, remove extreme observations from the appropriate group to bring about equal means.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(3) Follow (1),(2) till the p value is greater than 0.98&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please note that in our process of removal, we can't lose more that 2% of the test data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need help on two things:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(1) Is this procedure valid and is there a more effective way to ensure that the test/control populations are alike in terms of a single variable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(2) Our superiors want us to take more than one variable into consideration&amp;nbsp;in our "like-to-like" process. In this case, the proc ttest iterations cannot be used. How can we tackle this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if you need further elaboration on these&amp;nbsp;questions. Thanks for reading.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:14:55 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wanderers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-11-11T18:14:55Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Making two groups alike for test/control comparisons</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Making-two-groups-alike-for-test-control-comparisons/m-p/234244#M12367</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I work in the marketing analytics team of a bank and we work mainly on test/control testing. The test is the target population which was sent offers/campaigns and the control is left untreated. My team analyzes the difference in behavior between these two groups to gauge campaign performance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Before we move into comparison, we ensure that the test and control are "like-to-like." This means that the test and control are similar in terms of a variable that is thought to be significant. For example, for a campaign that is aimed at improving checking-account balances of customers, we ensure that the test and control have equal mean &lt;SPAN&gt;checking-account &lt;/SPAN&gt;balance i.e. they are "like-to-like." We have an iterative procedure that helps us do this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(1) Run proc ttest on the test/control data with the &lt;SPAN&gt;checking-account &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;balance as the "var" variable and "TEST/CONTROL" as the "class" variable&lt;/SPAN&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(2) If p-value is not greater than&amp;nbsp;0.98, remove extreme observations from the appropriate group to bring about equal means.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(3) Follow (1),(2) till the p value is greater than 0.98&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please note that in our process of removal, we can't lose more that 2% of the test data.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I need help on two things:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(1) Is this procedure valid and is there a more effective way to ensure that the test/control populations are alike in terms of a single variable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(2) Our superiors want us to take more than one variable into consideration&amp;nbsp;in our "like-to-like" process. In this case, the proc ttest iterations cannot be used. How can we tackle this?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please let me know if you need further elaboration on these&amp;nbsp;questions. Thanks for reading.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 18:14:55 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Making-two-groups-alike-for-test-control-comparisons/m-p/234244#M12367</guid>
      <dc:creator>wanderers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-11T18:14:55Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Making two groups alike for test/control comparisons</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Making-two-groups-alike-for-test-control-comparisons/m-p/234292#M12368</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If your &lt;EM&gt;significant&lt;/EM&gt; variable really makes a difference in the behavior of your customers, then pairing would give you more power in your comparison. To enable a paired comparison, each tested customer should be paired with one or more controls on the basis of your significant variable(s). &lt;BR /&gt;If you want to involve more than one variable, one way is to define a distance that combines the variables into a single measure.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:05:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Making-two-groups-alike-for-test-control-comparisons/m-p/234292#M12368</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-11T21:05:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Making two groups alike for test/control comparisons</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Making-two-groups-alike-for-test-control-comparisons/m-p/234936#M12415</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This falls in the general area of causal modeling of observational data. &amp;nbsp;SAS tools (macros) for this have been developed by the Rand Corp. &amp;nbsp;See their &lt;A href="http://www.rand.org/statistics/twang.html" target="_self"&gt;TWANG project page&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 21:23:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Making-two-groups-alike-for-test-control-comparisons/m-p/234936#M12415</guid>
      <dc:creator>StatDave</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-16T21:23:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

