<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic binomial unequal group sizes in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/binomial-unequal-group-sizes/m-p/230321#M12152</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have binomial data for which the group sizes differ, how do you correct for it in proc glimmix?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=name;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;class var1 var2;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;model y/n=var1 var2 / dist=binomial link=logit;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;random randomvariable;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;y is for example the number of affected individuals per group that differs in size (n). I have been told that you can correct for this by adding an overdispersion parameter 'random _residual_;' but I am not too confident about this. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DDK</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-16T16:20:54Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>binomial unequal group sizes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/binomial-unequal-group-sizes/m-p/230321#M12152</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Dear all,&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you have binomial data for which the group sizes differ, how do you correct for it in proc glimmix?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For example:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=name;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;class var1 var2;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;model y/n=var1 var2 / dist=binomial link=logit;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;random randomvariable;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;y is for example the number of affected individuals per group that differs in size (n). I have been told that you can correct for this by adding an overdispersion parameter 'random _residual_;' but I am not too confident about this. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:20:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/binomial-unequal-group-sizes/m-p/230321#M12152</guid>
      <dc:creator>DDK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-16T16:20:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: binomial unequal group sizes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/binomial-unequal-group-sizes/m-p/230344#M12156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You don't need to correct for this -- it is automatically taken care of. Do not use the 'random _residual_" statement for this purpose (this is for overdispersion: high variability than one would obtain with a binomial distribution).&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:03:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/binomial-unequal-group-sizes/m-p/230344#M12156</guid>
      <dc:creator>lvm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-16T19:03:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: binomial unequal group sizes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/binomial-unequal-group-sizes/m-p/230349#M12157</link>
      <description>Agree. And further, since the random-statement is not neccessary, it may be better to use a procedure (proc logistics) that is specialized for logistic regression.</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:26:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/binomial-unequal-group-sizes/m-p/230349#M12157</guid>
      <dc:creator>JacobSimonsen</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-16T19:26:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: binomial unequal group sizes</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/binomial-unequal-group-sizes/m-p/230381#M12158</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, thought it was a bit weird to correct for unequal sizes&amp;nbsp;using an overdispersion parameter. Good to hear a&amp;nbsp;confirmation that it is not necessary to do so.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 21:27:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/binomial-unequal-group-sizes/m-p/230381#M12158</guid>
      <dc:creator>DDK</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-16T21:27:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

