<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: PROC LOGISTIC interaction between categorical and continuous variable in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-interaction-between-categorical-and-continuous/m-p/218624#M11846</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My suggestion is removing &lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt; interaction effect between race (categorical) and distance from hospital . &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;then fit model again . Maybe '&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;distance ' took too much effect from 'race' . &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt; Check these category variable's main effect is significant or not before include the next interaction effect .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Xia Keshan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 12:10:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-05-26T12:10:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>PROC LOGISTIC interaction between categorical and continuous variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-interaction-between-categorical-and-continuous/m-p/218621#M11843</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pardon if this is an easy question, I'm pretty new to SAS and logistic regression in general.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Model: Response variable is dichotomous (1=ems heli transport, 0 = other form of trans). Model includes 6 explanatory variables - 3 continuous (age, injury severity, distance from hospital) and 3 categorical (race, arrival time in ED, and injury mechanism). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have found significant interaction between race (categorical) and distance from hospital (continuous), but only for one of the categories (hispanic, all of the others are nonsignificant). I don't want to stratify because race is the explanatory variable that I am most interested in. How should I treat this? Can't seem to find answers anywhere, and most of the literature has the categorical variable as dichotomous. Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2015 16:51:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-interaction-between-categorical-and-continuous/m-p/218621#M11843</guid>
      <dc:creator>USC_MedStudent</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-24T16:51:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC LOGISTIC interaction between categorical and continuous variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-interaction-between-categorical-and-continuous/m-p/218622#M11844</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could define distance ranges and stratify on those.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PG&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 03:16:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-interaction-between-categorical-and-continuous/m-p/218622#M11844</guid>
      <dc:creator>PGStats</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T03:16:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC LOGISTIC interaction between categorical and continuous variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-interaction-between-categorical-and-continuous/m-p/218623#M11845</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;There really isn't anything to "treat".&amp;nbsp; You just report the results for all the levels of race. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there is an interaction between race and distance, then there is an interaction - it makes no sense to say the interaction exists only at one level of race. That would be the equivalent of saying "Me are taller than women, but women aren't shorter than men".&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In addition, "significance" is a bad guideline for including or excluding a variable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But beware if any of your levels of race have small n.&amp;nbsp; That could cause problems and you could deal with those by either combining categories or deleting some people (E.g. if you use the standard US Census levels of race, then, in most of the USA, there will be very small numbers of "Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander" and "American Indian or Alaskan Native".&amp;nbsp; In some areas there will be small numbers of other categories as well (not a lot of African Americans in Maine, for example). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 11:23:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-interaction-between-categorical-and-continuous/m-p/218623#M11845</guid>
      <dc:creator>plf515</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T11:23:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: PROC LOGISTIC interaction between categorical and continuous variable</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-interaction-between-categorical-and-continuous/m-p/218624#M11846</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My suggestion is removing &lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt; interaction effect between race (categorical) and distance from hospital . &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;then fit model again . Maybe '&lt;SPAN style="font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;distance ' took too much effect from 'race' . &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, 'Lucida Grande', sans-serif;"&gt; Check these category variable's main effect is significant or not before include the next interaction effect .&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Xia Keshan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2015 12:10:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/PROC-LOGISTIC-interaction-between-categorical-and-continuous/m-p/218624#M11846</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ksharp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-05-26T12:10:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

