<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Proc lifereg : scoring in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-lifereg-scoring/m-p/199757#M10695</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case of &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;Proc Lifereg modeling, i&lt;/SPAN&gt;s there a way of scoring a validation data set using the parameter estimates obtained from a training data set, something similar to Proc score?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And how do we compare the model performance between the validation and training data sets, something along the lines of gains/lift charts/tables?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>krishmar1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-07-09T18:21:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc lifereg : scoring</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-lifereg-scoring/m-p/199757#M10695</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In case of &lt;SPAN style="font-size: 13.3333330154419px;"&gt;Proc Lifereg modeling, i&lt;/SPAN&gt;s there a way of scoring a validation data set using the parameter estimates obtained from a training data set, something similar to Proc score?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And how do we compare the model performance between the validation and training data sets, something along the lines of gains/lift charts/tables?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Please help!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:21:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-lifereg-scoring/m-p/199757#M10695</guid>
      <dc:creator>krishmar1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-07-09T18:21:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Proc lifereg : scoring</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-lifereg-scoring/m-p/199758#M10696</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Proc lifereg does include the distribution (_DIST_) when it writes out coefficients, but I don't think proc score can use _DIST_ to create estimated values from coefficients from LIFEREG.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Looking at statistics references it is not easy to figure out how to simulate models created with PROC LIFEREG. That suggests it may be simpler to use something else. I tried to simulate an example from a SAS website (&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/67523/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_lifereg_examples01.htm" title="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/67523/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_lifereg_examples01.htm"&gt;SAS/STAT(R) 13.2 User's Guide&lt;/A&gt;) in Excel using information about the Weibull distribution to verify that I could match predicted and actuals from their example, but I could not do so.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note to SAS Support: This person is right. This is someting not in SAS that is needed for PROC LIFEREG to be useful.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;THIS IS SOMETHING MISSING FROM SAS WITHOUT A FIX DOCUMENTED BY SAS!!!!!!!!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2015 20:36:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-lifereg-scoring/m-p/199758#M10696</guid>
      <dc:creator>econ_stat_modeler007</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-13T20:36:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

