<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Proc surveyreg. in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveyreg/m-p/27840#M1057</link>
    <description>Hi, I am trying to examine interaction effect using proc surveyreg.&lt;BR /&gt;
I have coded -1 and 1 by different characteristics of groups and want to examine 2-way anova (fixed) using proc surveyreg. Is there any better way to examine interaction effect when dealing with population-based surveillance?</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:40:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-11-03T22:40:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Proc surveyreg.</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveyreg/m-p/27840#M1057</link>
      <description>Hi, I am trying to examine interaction effect using proc surveyreg.&lt;BR /&gt;
I have coded -1 and 1 by different characteristics of groups and want to examine 2-way anova (fixed) using proc surveyreg. Is there any better way to examine interaction effect when dealing with population-based surveillance?</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:40:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Proc-surveyreg/m-p/27840#M1057</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-11-03T22:40:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

