<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Design effect interpretation in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193872#M10318</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The lesson here is "always include your program when you ask a question." &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-08-20T12:38:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Design effect interpretation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193869#M10315</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'am using the Surveyfreq procedure to get design effect of my proportions, but i have a problem with deisgn effects interpretation, see the result below :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; DEFF&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ALL&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1.32&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Women&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.7&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Men&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0.7&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;my sampling design is a one stage clustering design, so i understand having the 1.32 (&amp;gt;1) but why the deff is so smaller for men an women?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you help me please?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2015 15:18:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193869#M10315</guid>
      <dc:creator>kmel56</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-06T15:18:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design effect interpretation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193870#M10316</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you using the RATE= or TOTAL= option?&amp;nbsp; It would be useful to see your syntax. The way that SURVEYFREQ estimates the design effect is documented as follows:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63962/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_surveyfreq_a0000000255.htm" title="http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statug/63962/HTML/default/viewer.htm#statug_surveyfreq_a0000000255.htm"&gt;SAS/STAT(R) 9.3 User's Guide&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2015 12:53:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193870#M10316</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-07T12:53:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design effect interpretation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193871#M10317</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Rick,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But the problem was away, I didn't include the weighting factor, now with weights it much better.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 07:46:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193871#M10317</guid>
      <dc:creator>kmel56</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-20T07:46:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design effect interpretation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193872#M10318</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The lesson here is "always include your program when you ask a question." &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:38:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193872#M10318</guid>
      <dc:creator>Rick_SAS</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-20T12:38:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Design effect interpretation</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193873#M10319</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes, Sorry, my question was incomplete.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;THanks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2015 13:13:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/Design-effect-interpretation/m-p/193873#M10319</guid>
      <dc:creator>kmel56</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-08-20T13:13:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

