<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX? in Statistical Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191912#M10181</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many rows of data do you have?&amp;nbsp; From that we can determine if a multivariate approach is feasible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Negbin with log(total_seq) as an offset might be a very good candidate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-04-29T17:37:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191905#M10174</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Dear SAS Community,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is it possible to perform a MANOVA with GLIMMIX? I could only finf examples with GLM.&amp;nbsp; I have a RCBD with data having many zeroes.&amp;nbsp; I want to compare bacterial DNA sequences (26 dependent variables) found in 2 different nematodes populations (pop) in a multivariate analyze.&amp;nbsp; Because these are proportions (event/trial) response variables (bacterial sequence/total number of sequences), I would use a binomial or negbin distribution.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here is my data with factor pop having 2 levels, the total number of DNA sequences found for every population, and the number of sequences of each one of the 26 dependent variables.&amp;nbsp; I analyzed the first dependent variable as a univariate, but&amp;nbsp; I would greatly appreciate if someone could help me with an approach for a multivariate analyze with GLIMMIX.&amp;nbsp; Thank you in advance!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;data one;&lt;BR /&gt;input blk pop total_seq&amp;nbsp; A_junii A_oryzae A_brasilense B_vestrisii B_caledonica C_pinensis C_hispanicum C_metalli D_chinhatensis D_neptuniae F_feengrott M_polyspora&lt;BR /&gt;M_saperdae N_simplex P_parvula&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; P_carboxy R_pickettii R_solanace R_syzygii R_giardinii R_blasticus S_thermophilus S_maltophilia S_flavogriseus S_vinaceus Z_ramigera;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;datalines;&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1116&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 9&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 715&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 92&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 10&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 14&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1557&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 74&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 141&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 431&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 19&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 170&lt;BR /&gt;2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1203&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 200&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 683&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 6&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 37&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 28&lt;BR /&gt;2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 995&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 21&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 618&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 45&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 25&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 67&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 230&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 53&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 92&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1217&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 29&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 16&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 37&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 26&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 85&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 20&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 54&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 700&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1287&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1249&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&lt;BR /&gt;4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 464&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 8&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 236&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 9&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 51&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 4&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&lt;BR /&gt;5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 151&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 3&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 98&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&lt;BR /&gt;5&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 2&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 1738&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 68&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 108&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 110&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 68&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 50&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 82&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 73&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 87&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 26&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 45&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 178&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 104&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 99&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 0&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 7&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=one method=quad;&lt;BR /&gt;class blk pop;&lt;BR /&gt;model A_junii/total_seq=pop/dist=binomial link=logit;&lt;BR /&gt;random int/sub=blk;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caroline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:54:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191905#M10174</guid>
      <dc:creator>palolix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-24T15:54:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191906#M10175</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Caroline,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One way to think of this is as a "repeated measures" analysis.&amp;nbsp; You would need to convert the dataset to long format, with each record having blk, pop, total_seq as before and two new variables, one indicating the species, and the other the count associated with that species.&amp;nbsp; Then an analysis would look like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=one method=laplace;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class blk pop species;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;model count/total_seq=pop species pop*species/dist=binomial link=logit;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;random species/sub=blk*pop type=chol R;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now the tests are asymptotically similar to Wilk's Lambda, if I remember correctly.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2014 15:24:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191906#M10175</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-25T15:24:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191907#M10176</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steve!&amp;nbsp; thank you so much for your suggestion.&amp;nbsp; It sounds like a very clever Idea to analyze it as "Repetead measures", I guess because of the possibility of correlation between observations on the same subject.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I run your code, but I had a little problem due to syntax error because of the Chol R (I guess this is not available for SAS 9.3).&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I tried with chol only, but did not yield any result.&amp;nbsp; I also tried with UN and it works, but I don´t know if it is a good Idea. I guess I could also try all the others to select the one with the lowest AIC.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Steve!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caroline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 11:58:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191907#M10176</guid>
      <dc:creator>palolix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-28T11:58:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191908#M10177</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;My bad.&amp;nbsp; No residual option, so the R in the random statement is wrong.&amp;nbsp; Switch to GCORR:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;random species/sub=blk*pop type=chol GCORR;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Or add the residual option and drop method=laplace, so the code woul look like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=one;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class blk pop species;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;model count/total_seq=pop species pop*species/dist=binomial link=logit;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;random species/residual sub=blk*pop type=chol R;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think doing this G side would be better, but it is going to depend on convergence more than anything else.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;About the rest, I picked the Cholesky parameterization over the unstructured as it guarantees that the matrix will not be nonpositive definite.&amp;nbsp; Much harder to interpret the entries, though, so GCORR (correlation matrix corresponding to the G matrix) is a better option to look at the relation between species.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is a case where other structures are not appropriate except maybe the factor analytic structures, as they all force some kind of relationship between the variables.&amp;nbsp; You might step through FA(1) to FA(n), looking at AICC, to find a factor analysis approach.&amp;nbsp; Getting loadings out and interpreting them would be, mmm, well challenging is the best term I kind think of.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Message was edited by: Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:15:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191908#M10177</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-28T13:15:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191909#M10178</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Steve.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried random species/sub=blk*pop type=chol GCORR; but got this WARNING: The initial estimates did not yield a valid objective function.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried then the last code you gave me (with the residual option), and got this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ERROR 22-322: Syntax error, expecting one of the following: ;, (, ALPHA, CL, G, GC, GCI, GCOORD,&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; GCOORDS, GCORR, GI, GROUP, KNOTINFO, KNOTMAX, KNOTMETHOD, KNOTMIN, LDATA,&lt;BR /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; RESIDUAL, RSIDE, SOLUTION, SUBJECT, TYPE, V, VC, VCI, VCORR, VI.&lt;BR /&gt;ERROR 202-322: The option or parameter is not recognized and will be ignored.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;img id="smileysad" class="emoticon emoticon-smileysad" src="https://communities.sas.com/i/smilies/16x16_smiley-sad.png" alt="Smiley Sad" title="Smiley Sad" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caroline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:20:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191909#M10178</guid>
      <dc:creator>palolix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-28T15:20:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191910#M10179</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry about the last part--too much history with PROC MIXED.&amp;nbsp; Try &lt;STRONG&gt;V&lt;/STRONG&gt; rather than R.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the first WARNING may be data dependent.&amp;nbsp; In any multivariate program, you have to be sure that the data are "deeper than they are wide", as one of my professors put it&amp;nbsp; You may be trying to estimate more parameters than you have data points.&amp;nbsp; With 26 species, an unstructured matrix holds 325 parameters.&amp;nbsp; For binomial data, a good rule of thumb is ten observations per parameter estimated, so...&amp;nbsp; Unless you have more than 325 rows, the process won't even start, and unless you have around 3000 rows or more, the estimates aren't going to be very stable.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You may want to reconsider how many species you can handle in a single analysis. Also, PROC PLS comes to mind, but I am still pretty unsure about lots of left-hand side variables and only a few right-hand side.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 17:55:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191910#M10179</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-28T17:55:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191911#M10180</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you very much for your help Steve.&amp;nbsp; I followed your first advice changing to &lt;STRONG&gt;V, &lt;/STRONG&gt;but unfortunately did not work.&amp;nbsp; I reduced then the species number from 26 to 14, trying this 2 codes, but still getting following warnings;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=one method=laplace;&lt;BR /&gt;class blk pop species;&lt;BR /&gt;model No_seq/total_seq=pop species pop*species/dist=binomial link=logit;&lt;BR /&gt;random species/sub=blk*pop type=chol GCORR;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WARNING: The initial estimates did not yield a valid objective function.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc glimmix data=one;&lt;BR /&gt;class blk pop species;&lt;BR /&gt;model No_seq/total_seq=pop species pop*species/dist=binomial link=logit;&lt;BR /&gt;random species/residual sub=blk*pop type=chol V;&lt;BR /&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;WARNING: Pseudo-likelihood update fails in outer iteration 0.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Do you think would be a good Idea to try with a negbin distribution (because of the zeroes)? Or should reduce the number of species to 10?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Steve!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caroline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 08:06:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191911#M10180</guid>
      <dc:creator>palolix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-29T08:06:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191912#M10181</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;How many rows of data do you have?&amp;nbsp; From that we can determine if a multivariate approach is feasible.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Negbin with log(total_seq) as an offset might be a very good candidate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 17:37:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191912#M10181</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-29T17:37:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191913#M10182</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have 2 populations of nematodes with 5 replicates each, which makes a total of 10 experimental units.&amp;nbsp; In long format, I have 140 rows;14 bacteria species (dependent variable) evaluated for each exp. unit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried the negbin dist, but unfortunately did also not converge.&amp;nbsp; Do you think it may have something to do that the dependent var "species" in the random statement is not a numeric variable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot Steve!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caroline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2014 18:59:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191913#M10182</guid>
      <dc:creator>palolix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-29T18:59:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191914#M10183</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;If there were familial groupings for the sequences to bring it down to maybe half that number some things might work.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For the negbin approach you would use something like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ltotal=log(total_seq);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;model count=pop species pop*species/dist=negbinomial offset=ltotal;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But I am afraid that you may have identified the problem as zero-inflation.&amp;nbsp; If that is the case, then we should very likely move this to PROC GENMOD, but I'm not sure if it will handle both repeated measures and zero-inflation.&amp;nbsp; If you tried, it would look like:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc genmod data=one;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class blk pop species;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;ltotal=log(total_seq);&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;model No_seq=pop species pop*species/dist=zinb link=log offset=ltotal;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;zeromodel pop species pop*species/link=logit;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;repeated subject=blk*pop/ type=un;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I really don't know if this will run or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2014 18:43:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191914#M10183</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-04-30T18:43:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191915#M10184</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mmmm.... it cannot be, I am probably doing something wrong or we are missing something.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I reduced the species to 5 but still cannot converge.&amp;nbsp; I tried the genmode, changing the code a little bit due to the offset statement (I hope was ok), but did not work either.&amp;nbsp; I will send you my data attached so you can better see if we are missing something (the analysis with 10 species).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank&amp;nbsp; you for still helping me Steve!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caroline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2014 18:35:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191915#M10184</guid>
      <dc:creator>palolix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-01T18:35:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191916#M10185</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try running this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc freq data=one;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;tables pop*species;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;weight no_seq;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It looks to me like there is nearly a complete separation of sequences by population, with only r_giardi and r_syszygi and z_ramige really showing up in both populations.&amp;nbsp; As a result, I can't find a good optimizing technique to handle these data in GLIMMIX.&amp;nbsp; Maybe a log-linear model (see Agresti's &lt;EM&gt;Categorical Data Analysis&lt;/EM&gt;) could get you tests.&amp;nbsp; But to me, with these 10 species sequences, there is an obvious separation. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;You could look at PROC FACTOR, where the iris data is factor analyzed.&amp;nbsp; Your equivalent of sepal length, etc. could be logit(no_seq/total_seq) for each of the species, so that data would be in wide format,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Try the following and see if it makes any sense:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 8pt;"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;data two;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;set one;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;prop=no_seq/total_seq;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc transpose data=two out=three;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;var prop;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;by blk pop;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;id species;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;idlabel species;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc pls data=three method=rrr details varss;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;class blk pop;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;model a_brasil b_caledo c_pinens d_chinha f_feengr m_polysp r_syzygi s_vinace z_ramige = &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;blk|pop;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The graphs produced in interactive mode pretty much explain what is going on.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2014 15:40:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191916#M10185</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-02T15:40:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191917#M10186</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Steve,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;thank you very much for your good Ideas and suggestions.&amp;nbsp; I´m sorry I could not reply before, but my SAS License expired.&amp;nbsp; You are right, I did not expected such a differences between the two populations, so I understand the problems you were facing when trying with different optimizations.&amp;nbsp; The graphs and the tables were for sure a good Idea to see those differences.&amp;nbsp; I think before getting deeper and deeper with this multivariate approach including the 2 populations, I would rather leave this on &lt;EM&gt;standby&lt;/EM&gt; and go ahead with an univariate analyze for comparing the two populations, and a multivariate analyze for each population separately. In relation to the univariate analyze, I would like to ask you something; when should you use the option method=quad or laplace for a binomial or negbin distribution?&amp;nbsp; Is it preferable in order to optimize your model?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks a lot Steve!!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caroline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 12:56:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191917#M10186</guid>
      <dc:creator>palolix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-15T12:56:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191918#M10187</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Caroline,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Back from hobnobbing with my fellow wizards...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Based on what I read in Walt Stroup's book, &lt;EM&gt;Generalized Linear Mixed Models,&lt;/EM&gt; I would ALWAYS use method=quad or laplace for mixed models where the distribution had a functional relationship between the expected value and the variance--and this is the case for both the poisson and the negative binomial.&amp;nbsp; The only time I might not would be after great frustration and non-convergence, and if I had to fall back to the pseudo-likelihood methods for distributions of this kind, I would not be able to do covariance structure selection using information criteria.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Steve Denham&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2014 17:14:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191918#M10187</guid>
      <dc:creator>SteveDenham</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-19T17:14:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: MANOVA in GLIMMIX?</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191919#M10188</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you dear Steve!&amp;nbsp; method=laplace works wonderful for binomial and negbin when analyzing the sequences as univariate.&amp;nbsp; I tried the multivariate approach analyzing the two nematode populations separately, due to the hugh differences we observed between both, but still did not work.&amp;nbsp; I think that the problem is due to the high variability among replicates within a population.&amp;nbsp; For most bacterial species (dependent var) happens that for one replicate 400 sequences (more or less) were registered whereas for the other 4 replicates 0 sequences were found. I guess that is also the reason why for most of the species (in the univariate analysis) I do not find any significant differences between the two populations.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Caroline&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 18:29:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/Statistical-Procedures/MANOVA-in-GLIMMIX/m-p/191919#M10188</guid>
      <dc:creator>palolix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-05-21T18:29:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

