<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Slow Report with Group Breaks in SAS Web Report Studio</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Web-Report-Studio/Slow-Report-with-Group-Breaks/m-p/303004#M2236</link>
    <description>Perhaps you need to add some aggregations.&lt;BR /&gt;Do the report use any other hierarchies / subsets? &lt;BR /&gt;The permutations you mention are themselves quite small.</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 18:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LinusH</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-10-06T18:22:39Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Slow Report with Group Breaks</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Web-Report-Studio/Slow-Report-with-Group-Breaks/m-p/299037#M2226</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I’m trying to understand why one of our Web Report Studio Reports is running so slow.&amp;nbsp; Except for one report all of our Web Report Studio Reports are moderately fast.&amp;nbsp; All of the reports are based off of tables which build to cubes and then to information maps. This report uses group breaks four levels down.&amp;nbsp; The group breaks have level permutation of 19, 5, 2, 50.&amp;nbsp; I noticed that when I take out the forth level of group breaks with the 50 permutations that the report runs at a reasonable speed.&amp;nbsp; With all of the group breaks the report attempts to load forever.&amp;nbsp; The table for the cube is one of our medium tables.&amp;nbsp; I have the new page for each value checked.&amp;nbsp; I’m working with IT to enable cube tuning.&amp;nbsp; This particular report was working a few days ago. I do not know of a change that caused it to load forever.&amp;nbsp; Any advice on improving the load speed?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2016 20:37:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Web-Report-Studio/Slow-Report-with-Group-Breaks/m-p/299037#M2226</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidPhillips2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-09-16T20:37:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slow Report with Group Breaks</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Web-Report-Studio/Slow-Report-with-Group-Breaks/m-p/303004#M2236</link>
      <description>Perhaps you need to add some aggregations.&lt;BR /&gt;Do the report use any other hierarchies / subsets? &lt;BR /&gt;The permutations you mention are themselves quite small.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 18:22:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Web-Report-Studio/Slow-Report-with-Group-Breaks/m-p/303004#M2236</guid>
      <dc:creator>LinusH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T18:22:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Slow Report with Group Breaks</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Web-Report-Studio/Slow-Report-with-Group-Breaks/m-p/303007#M2238</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The feedback I got from SAS is cubes do not use aggregations with groupbreaks properly and group breaks are inefficient in general. &amp;nbsp;If you have 3 or more levels of group breaks preformance suffers. &amp;nbsp;Also displaying too many group break permutations is known to cause issues. &amp;nbsp;Hierachies and group breaks are seperate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2016 18:28:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Web-Report-Studio/Slow-Report-with-Group-Breaks/m-p/303007#M2238</guid>
      <dc:creator>DavidPhillips2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-10-06T18:28:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

