<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic The results of data queries as a &amp;quot;view&amp;quot; in SAS Visual Analytics</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/The-results-of-data-queries-as-a-quot-view-quot/m-p/155783#M690</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to build a kind of DWH for tables that form the basis for a large variety of VA reports. These tables will have, e.g. all bills, all members, all providers, etc. Based on the reports I will define filters for the bits of data that I need. Often, I will want to combine information from different tables (e.g. total of bills from all members in a given city). I am wondering what the best way to so is. In particular:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If I create a star schema or other query in the data builder, my impression is that a new table in memory is created. This practically multiplies the size of the bills table (the biggest I have) with the number of reports I want to base o it (for all different combinations of data). Is there a way to have a kind of 'view', i.e. a data query that doesn't result in a table in memory (but, of course metadata does get created), but only when it gets called (at the moment of the creation of a report) and then doesn't exist anymore once the visualisation is made?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If I create one big mastertable, it means that all data of a given member or provider is repeated on all lines. I think there is no way around that if I want one data source?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If I have the separate tables for bills, members and providers, it means that I cannot combine the city of a member with the amount on a bill, without a data query, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All input will be very helpful!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers, Marcel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:19:58 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarcelHaas</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-11-04T10:19:58Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The results of data queries as a "view"</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/The-results-of-data-queries-as-a-quot-view-quot/m-p/155783#M690</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want to build a kind of DWH for tables that form the basis for a large variety of VA reports. These tables will have, e.g. all bills, all members, all providers, etc. Based on the reports I will define filters for the bits of data that I need. Often, I will want to combine information from different tables (e.g. total of bills from all members in a given city). I am wondering what the best way to so is. In particular:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If I create a star schema or other query in the data builder, my impression is that a new table in memory is created. This practically multiplies the size of the bills table (the biggest I have) with the number of reports I want to base o it (for all different combinations of data). Is there a way to have a kind of 'view', i.e. a data query that doesn't result in a table in memory (but, of course metadata does get created), but only when it gets called (at the moment of the creation of a report) and then doesn't exist anymore once the visualisation is made?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If I create one big mastertable, it means that all data of a given member or provider is repeated on all lines. I think there is no way around that if I want one data source?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- If I have the separate tables for bills, members and providers, it means that I cannot combine the city of a member with the amount on a bill, without a data query, right?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;All input will be very helpful!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cheers, Marcel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:19:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/The-results-of-data-queries-as-a-quot-view-quot/m-p/155783#M690</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcelHaas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-04T10:19:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The results of data queries as a "view"</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/The-results-of-data-queries-as-a-quot-view-quot/m-p/155784#M691</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems now that it is best to use Star Schemas. The only annoyabnce could be that between fact tables and dimension tables one can only use one linking variable, not a combination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 15:43:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/The-results-of-data-queries-as-a-quot-view-quot/m-p/155784#M691</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarcelHaas</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-11-19T15:43:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

