<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Unused report in Visual analytics in SAS Visual Analytics</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Unused-report-in-Visual-analytics/m-p/340180#M6574</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;surely report definitions have NO impact on the performance of sas va.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as they are not in view or edit&amp;nbsp;mode, they do not consume any performance and/or memory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only Some diskspace needed of cource to store the report definition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;greetings Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PeterWijers</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-03-11T18:19:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Unused report in Visual analytics</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Unused-report-in-Visual-analytics/m-p/334275#M6399</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question here for more knowledgable people than myself. We've a lot of unused reports in our Visual Analytics site at the moment. There's 2-300 reports atm from what I can see (and we're only really live with it about 4 months) without even looking at what's in people's own folders. I'd imagine vast majority of these are unused (don't have auditing turned on yet). Before I even turn on auditing, are there any performance impacts of having so many reports in VA? Like in a year, that could be 1000 reports which seems unsustainable but just need to know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 09:16:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Unused-report-in-Visual-analytics/m-p/334275#M6399</guid>
      <dc:creator>titan31</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-02-20T09:16:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused report in Visual analytics</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Unused-report-in-Visual-analytics/m-p/337691#M6522</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I don't think the number of VA reports will impact performance much. In my experience report performance is mainly governed by the data volumes and report complexity - number of report items, formulas, derived columns, groupings, rules etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Mar 2017 01:58:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Unused-report-in-Visual-analytics/m-p/337691#M6522</guid>
      <dc:creator>SASKiwi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-03T01:58:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Unused report in Visual analytics</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Unused-report-in-Visual-analytics/m-p/340180#M6574</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi there,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;surely report definitions have NO impact on the performance of sas va.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As long as they are not in view or edit&amp;nbsp;mode, they do not consume any performance and/or memory.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Only Some diskspace needed of cource to store the report definition.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;greetings Peter&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:19:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Unused-report-in-Visual-analytics/m-p/340180#M6574</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeterWijers</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-03-11T18:19:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

