<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Report Performance in SAS Visual Analytics</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Report-Performance/m-p/460114#M10107</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Karuna, you should do some testing first. If you create one big table in EG, and use a datasourcefilter in VA on the LASR table, and it takes more than ca 7 seconds to open&amp;nbsp;a report&amp;nbsp;(more than that, and the report users are going to be annoyed) you should create 5 smaller LASR tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't remember the source, but&amp;nbsp;reasearh&amp;nbsp;found&amp;nbsp;about 7 seconds to be max for opening a report before users&amp;nbsp;have&amp;nbsp;a negative experience, so I always try to have that as my limit. The alternative then is to add more hardware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erik Meyer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 17:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Erik_Zencos</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-05-04T17:31:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Report Performance</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Report-Performance/m-p/459990#M10101</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am creating similar kinds (not same) of Reports for 5 different Geographies.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What will be better in terms of Report &lt;STRONG&gt;Performance&lt;/STRONG&gt;- Creating One table in EG for all the Geos and filtering the data in Reports or Creating 5 different tables and using them in 5 Reports??&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PS - The data is huge for all the Geos and the Reports are taking considerable amount of time in Opening.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Karuna Tiwari&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 10:35:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Report-Performance/m-p/459990#M10101</guid>
      <dc:creator>KarunaTiwari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-04T10:35:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Report Performance</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Report-Performance/m-p/460114#M10107</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Karuna, you should do some testing first. If you create one big table in EG, and use a datasourcefilter in VA on the LASR table, and it takes more than ca 7 seconds to open&amp;nbsp;a report&amp;nbsp;(more than that, and the report users are going to be annoyed) you should create 5 smaller LASR tables.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't remember the source, but&amp;nbsp;reasearh&amp;nbsp;found&amp;nbsp;about 7 seconds to be max for opening a report before users&amp;nbsp;have&amp;nbsp;a negative experience, so I always try to have that as my limit. The alternative then is to add more hardware.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Erik Meyer&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 17:31:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Report-Performance/m-p/460114#M10107</guid>
      <dc:creator>Erik_Zencos</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-04T17:31:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Report Performance</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Report-Performance/m-p/460121#M10108</link>
      <description>Thanks for your reply Erik!!</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 17:42:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Visual-Analytics/Report-Performance/m-p/460121#M10108</guid>
      <dc:creator>KarunaTiwari</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-05-04T17:42:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

