<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Average Square Error way to high ?? in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Average-Square-Error-way-to-high/m-p/750701#M80719</link>
    <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I faced an issue of skewness with my continuous variables ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you talking about skewness of the target (or response) variable? Or skewness of the predictor variables?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;... for which I firstly transformed into log but it didn't work&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What didn't work? What did you see that makes you think it didn't work? What variable(s) did you transform?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but I got validation average square error as 116 so I am confused how to interpret such huge error&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Did you transform the target variable? You really haven't said if you did or did not.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What makes you think that a 116 is "huge"? What are typical values of sales? Maybe the interpretation is that the model didn't fit well; or maybe the interpretation is that you have very large values of sales and a 116 is reasonable. We need a lot more information and context here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2021 18:32:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-06-27T18:32:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Average Square Error way to high ??</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Average-Square-Error-way-to-high/m-p/545199#M74287</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello guys,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Currently, I am doing one project on SAS Enterprise Miner, just needed one help while doing modelling I faced an issue of skewness with my continuous variables for which I firstly transformed into log but it didn't work but when changing it into square I got my answer and skewness issue was solved further I did modeling and the result was very extreme, my target variable was estimation of sales basically continuous, and modeling approach was linear regression, but I got validation average square error as 116 so&amp;nbsp; I am confused how to interpret&amp;nbsp; such huge error secondly when the same transformation is done through log the error rate is 0.25 but the continuous variable is not skewed.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;Please, your efforts will be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank You in advance.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:33:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Average-Square-Error-way-to-high/m-p/545199#M74287</guid>
      <dc:creator>saraiya0090</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-22T12:33:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Average Square Error way to high ??</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Average-Square-Error-way-to-high/m-p/750691#M80717</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You have squared your continuous variable. That may be the cause.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2021 17:22:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Average-Square-Error-way-to-high/m-p/750691#M80717</guid>
      <dc:creator>Sajid01</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-27T17:22:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Average Square Error way to high ??</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Average-Square-Error-way-to-high/m-p/750701#M80719</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I faced an issue of skewness with my continuous variables ...&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Are you talking about skewness of the target (or response) variable? Or skewness of the predictor variables?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;... for which I firstly transformed into log but it didn't work&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What didn't work? What did you see that makes you think it didn't work? What variable(s) did you transform?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;but I got validation average square error as 116 so I am confused how to interpret such huge error&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Did you transform the target variable? You really haven't said if you did or did not.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What makes you think that a 116 is "huge"? What are typical values of sales? Maybe the interpretation is that the model didn't fit well; or maybe the interpretation is that you have very large values of sales and a 116 is reasonable. We need a lot more information and context here.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2021 18:32:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Average-Square-Error-way-to-high/m-p/750701#M80719</guid>
      <dc:creator>PaigeMiller</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-06-27T18:32:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

