<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Calculating Delta P or Standardized Co-efficeints in PROC LOGISTIC in SAS Procedures</title>
    <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Calculating-Delta-P-or-Standardized-Co-efficeints-in-PROC/m-p/32284#M7756</link>
    <description>Hi slutsky_fan,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can you please post a full reference for Menard 2002? I am curious why coefficients produced by PROC LOGISTIC are called standardized/partially standardized - to my knowledge they are not standardized at all...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regarding your second statement, could you clarify instead of what Menard recommends calculating this Delta-P statistic?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Also, I'm not sure what are the L.sub.1 and L.sub.0 in your formula - could you put some detail about these?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you!</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:05:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>statsplank</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2009-05-14T22:05:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Calculating Delta P or Standardized Co-efficeints in PROC LOGISTIC</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Calculating-Delta-P-or-Standardized-Co-efficeints-in-PROC/m-p/32283#M7755</link>
      <description>I've read (Menard, 2002) that standardized co-efficients produced in SAS PROC LOGISTIC are only partially standardized- does anyone know if this is still true, or if there has been an update since this was published.&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Secondly,  Menard recommends instead to calculate the Delta-P statistic&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Delta P = exp([L.sub.1])/1 + exp([L.sub.1]) - exp([L.sub.0])/1 + exp([L.sub.0])&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Is anyone aware of an option in PROC LOGISTIC that would give this statistic? &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
-thanks</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 18:12:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Calculating-Delta-P-or-Standardized-Co-efficeints-in-PROC/m-p/32283#M7755</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-14T18:12:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Calculating Delta P or Standardized Co-efficeints in PROC LOGISTIC</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Calculating-Delta-P-or-Standardized-Co-efficeints-in-PROC/m-p/32284#M7756</link>
      <description>Hi slutsky_fan,&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Can you please post a full reference for Menard 2002? I am curious why coefficients produced by PROC LOGISTIC are called standardized/partially standardized - to my knowledge they are not standardized at all...&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Regarding your second statement, could you clarify instead of what Menard recommends calculating this Delta-P statistic?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Also, I'm not sure what are the L.sub.1 and L.sub.0 in your formula - could you put some detail about these?&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
Thank you!</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 22:05:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Calculating-Delta-P-or-Standardized-Co-efficeints-in-PROC/m-p/32284#M7756</guid>
      <dc:creator>statsplank</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-05-14T22:05:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Calculating Delta P or Standardized Co-efficeints in PROC LOGISTIC</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Calculating-Delta-P-or-Standardized-Co-efficeints-in-PROC/m-p/32285#M7757</link>
      <description>sorry, I've gotten involved in other projects ( end of semester chaos)  since my post- I'm trying to figure out where I left off. To partially answer your question, with regard to PROC LOGISTIC I'm referring to using the 'stb' option to get standardized co-efficients. ( which I', confused about if they are 'fully standardized.'&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
In Forest Science 52(6) 2006 'Best Predictors for Postfire Mortality of Ponderosa Pine Trees in the Intermountain West' the authors ranked the significant variables using the stb option. I think this would only work for quantitative varaibles vs. categorical. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I've got to get back to the library to get the specifics of the Menard citation. &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I got the formula for delta p here: &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_3_29/ai_83315687/pg_5/" target="_blank"&gt;http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HCZ/is_3_29/ai_83315687/pg_5/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
and more discussion here:&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;A href="http://www.springerlink.com/content/f183527308p220n1/fulltext.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.springerlink.com/content/f183527308p220n1/fulltext.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
( I'm not sure if anyone can access this or if I only have access via my institution) &lt;BR /&gt;
&lt;BR /&gt;
I'll repost when I obtain the Menard pub.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 17:23:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Calculating-Delta-P-or-Standardized-Co-efficeints-in-PROC/m-p/32285#M7757</guid>
      <dc:creator>deleted_user</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2009-06-03T17:23:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Calculating Delta P or Standardized Co-efficeints in PROC LOGISTIC</title>
      <link>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Calculating-Delta-P-or-Standardized-Co-efficeints-in-PROC/m-p/32286#M7758</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;For delta_p calculation, try the following code:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;proc logistic data=&amp;amp;data ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; model &amp;amp;depvar (event="1") = ... ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ods output parameterestimates=_parms (where=(variable ne "Intercept"));&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;proc sql noprint; select sum(&amp;amp;depvar)/count(*) into :prior from &amp;amp;data; quit;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;data delta_p;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; set _parms; retain P0 &amp;amp;prior;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; L0=log(P0/(1-P0));&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; L1=L0+estimate;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; P1=exp(L1)/(1+exp(L1));&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Delta_P=P1-P0;&amp;nbsp; drop L0 L1;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;run;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 08:40:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://communities.sas.com/t5/SAS-Procedures/Calculating-Delta-P-or-Standardized-Co-efficeints-in-PROC/m-p/32286#M7758</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alfredo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-01-18T08:40:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

